Which of these baptisms should be considered valid? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 10:09:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Which of these baptisms should be considered valid? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which of these baptisms should be considered valid?
#1
Sprinkling baptism of a baby by a clergyperson
 
#2
Full immersion baptism of an adult by a clergyperson
 
#3
Full immersion baptism of an adult who was baptized as a baby by a clergyperson
 
#4
Full immersion baptism of an adult using only the name of Jesus and not the Trinitarian formula
 
#5
Sprinkling baptism of an adult
 
#6
Baptism in a Mormon temple
 
#7
"Baptism" of a dead person by proxy in a Mormon temple
 
#8
Sprinkling baptism of a baby by an unordained relative
 
#9
Full immersion baptism of an adult by a church leader "ordained" only in a very loose sense
 
#10
Full immersion baptism of an adult who was baptized as a baby by a church leader "ordained" only in a very loose sense
 
#11
Full immersion baptism of a somewhat intoxicated adult (who was probably baptized as a baby) by a somewhat intoxicated vocalist of a Christian hardcore band in a bathtub at an after show party
 
#12
NOTA/Other (explain)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 21

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Which of these baptisms should be considered valid?  (Read 4995 times)
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« on: June 15, 2012, 10:10:54 PM »

I don't think any of them are valid - regardless of how much water you involve or who is performing the ritual, I see no evidence of some special magic status being conferred.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2012, 06:54:20 AM »

I don't think any of them are valid - regardless of how much water you involve or who is performing the ritual, I see no evidence of some special magic status being conferred.

Most Protestants do not believe baptism gives some type of "special magic status". I certainly don't believe that I now have some type of "special magic status" that I did not have prior to February 12.

Then why do it?
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2012, 08:13:07 AM »

I don't think any of them are valid - regardless of how much water you involve or who is performing the ritual, I see no evidence of some special magic status being conferred.

Most Protestants do not believe baptism gives some type of "special magic status". I certainly don't believe that I now have some type of "special magic status" that I did not have prior to February 12.

Then why do it?

Already been explained. I wanted to make an affirmation for myself, not just because my parents wanted me to like my childhood's confirmation.

That's not an answer to the question. Why hold this bizarre ritual at all if it doesn't somehow get you in good standing with your deity?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.