What’s a more detrimental commentary in American Studies? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 12:42:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  What’s a more detrimental commentary in American Studies? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: We are so obsessed with CRT that we forget it’s not the only controversial thing that is studied in taught in developing America’s tradition.
#1
Critical Race Theory
 
#2
Lost Cause Perspective
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 44

Author Topic: What’s a more detrimental commentary in American Studies?  (Read 790 times)
GeneralMacArthur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,039
United States


« on: June 27, 2021, 10:31:54 AM »

Nothing wrong with teaching theories. I was pleased to read about the tariff theory for Southern secession, as an example of how the mind sometimes works to try to put more benign veneers on unvarnished evil. And I am interested in learning more about critical race theory. Heck, some of it might have merit, and even if I end up believing, to go to the hyperbolic extreme, that it is all an attempt to create an alternative universe, to poison people's minds, that is still a learning experience. I also have more faith in the common sense of people to see through BS than some here and there and maybe everywhere, may have.

I do think all of this is probably over hyped. Much of our opinion maker class seems to get off on fomenting hysteria.

I have a theory, it's that gravity actually works in reverse and pulls us all up to the sky, but we're so fat that we stay on the ground anyway.  It's called GMA's theory of anti-gravity.  We should teach this to kids because it has just as much truth and evidence as the "lost cause" theory.

The southerners told us why they were going to secede, when they seceded they told us why they did it, they continued to tell us why they wanted to stay seceded while the war was happening, and after the war the big thing they complained about was the reason they seceded in the first place.

The Lost Cause "theory" didn't really catch on until the early 1900s.
Logged
GeneralMacArthur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,039
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2021, 12:58:42 PM »

Both should be banned from being taught in public schools

Assuming the summary below is accurate, what is so horrible to exposing students to the CRT construct? Heck, at least some of it comports with what may well be reality imo. The whole thing seems to have become a political football, and I am suspect not many really out there on the fruited plain even know what it means, assuming it has some cohesive meaning.

Yeah, those who criticize the theory on intellectual grounds, should have their day in the classroom too of course.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/critical-race-theory


We should teach it to kids the same way we teach the "stabbed in the back" myth as a cause behind the rise of Hitler.  As a fraudulent, ahistorical myth that bad-faith actors used to whitewash their nefarious agendas.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.