Is ElectionsGuy literally mad about the harm done to plantations?
No, I'm not talking about harm to plantations. 75% of the white south was non slave-owning. Much of them hard-working yeoman. And why would I be "mad" about this?
Cons: Blatantly violated constitution, suspended habeas corpus, imprisoned political enemies without trial, economic issues (tariffs, national bank), unions troops destruction of private property.
None of these are bad things, given that he was fighting against people who owned other people.
Freedom Fighter (normal)
Dare I say anything bad about Lincoln? Violating the constitution is OK as long as its against terrorists and disgusting people? Ironically you're sounding like a modern Republican. But you know loads more than I do, so feel free to correct my position.