Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 09:41:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 47
Author Topic: Democratic Grand Finale Tuesday results thread (1st polls close @8pm ET)  (Read 68993 times)
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #350 on: June 07, 2016, 09:04:20 PM »
New Mexico now identical to South Dakota
Logged
Wells
MikeWells12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,075
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #351 on: June 07, 2016, 09:05:12 PM »
Clinton in NJ: 64%
Sanders in ND: 63%
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,299
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #352 on: June 07, 2016, 09:05:27 PM »
If Clinton really only does win NM by 6-7 points (which is possible, due to Sanders winning some counties), that might spell trouble for her in CA.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,480
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #353 on: June 07, 2016, 09:05:58 PM »
Quote from: IceSpear on June 07, 2016, 08:46:46 PM
Quote from: #TheShadowyAbyss on June 07, 2016, 08:45:29 PM
It'll be hilarious if Sanders does better in NM than in SD

Yeah seriously. Hispanic heavy closed primary vs. white heavy open primary.

what is real anymore

Like I have said before, there is a huge difference between the "Latino Vote" in NM and AZ, and although some political sites day that NM is 55% Latino others say 35%, and ultimately NM is a state that defies the boundaries between "Old Spanish", "New Spanish", and those of Native Blood in a way that is both amazing and unique within any state of the US.

How will heavily "Latino" and "Asian" areas vote in California tonight
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #354 on: June 07, 2016, 09:06:22 PM »
« Edited: June 07, 2016, 09:08:33 PM by Registrar General 1184AZ »
Quote from: xingkerui on June 07, 2016, 09:05:27 PM
If Clinton really only does win NM by 6-7 points (which is possible, due to Sanders winning some counties), that might spell trouble for her in CA.
It seems most of the Counties Sanders is winning or won in NM are 75%+ white though.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #355 on: June 07, 2016, 09:06:28 PM »
Sanders needs 56% of the remaining vote in South Dakota.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #356 on: June 07, 2016, 09:07:26 PM »
Quote from: xingkerui on June 07, 2016, 09:05:27 PM
If Clinton really only does win NM by 6-7 points (which is possible, due to Sanders winning some counties), that might spell trouble for her in CA.

Clinton barely won New Mexico in 08.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #357 on: June 07, 2016, 09:07:43 PM »
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

She'll go into California needing about 100 delegates. We'll know in about a hour and a half whether Bernie has a chance to actually pull this off.
Logged
john cage bubblegum
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 361


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #358 on: June 07, 2016, 09:08:00 PM »
Quote from: xingkerui on June 07, 2016, 09:05:27 PM
If Clinton really only does win NM by 6-7 points (which is possible, due to Sanders winning some counties), that might spell trouble for her in CA.

Does it though?  She only won NM by 1 point in '08.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #359 on: June 07, 2016, 09:08:13 PM »
Quote from: ͡◔ ᴥ ͡◔ on June 07, 2016, 09:07:02 PM
Quote from: xingkerui on June 07, 2016, 09:05:27 PM
If Clinton really only does win NM by 6-7 points (which is possible, due to Sanders winning some counties), that might spell trouble for her in CA.

True, true. I think one of the big themes we're seeing tonight (and that we have been seeing in states like Oregon over the past few weeks) is that the race thing really isn't as relevant in most states as some people are making it out to be.
Race is extremely relevant in black-heavy states like NJ, but the hispanic, asian, and native American votes are heavily fragmented.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,809


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #360 on: June 07, 2016, 09:08:22 PM »
Clinton's lead in SD down to 5.84%. Falling, but not very quickly.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #361 on: June 07, 2016, 09:09:27 PM »
Clinton true lead down to about 1.4 percent in South Dakota.  2/3rds in.
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #362 on: June 07, 2016, 09:10:27 PM »
Quote from: Fusionmunster on June 07, 2016, 09:07:26 PM
Quote from: xingkerui on June 07, 2016, 09:05:27 PM
If Clinton really only does win NM by 6-7 points (which is possible, due to Sanders winning some counties), that might spell trouble for her in CA.

Clinton barely won New Mexico in 08.

TBF, that was Bill's fault.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,507
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #363 on: June 07, 2016, 09:10:30 PM »
I don't understand ...
How can Sanders win N.D. by such a huge margin, but yet Hillary is currently leading in S.D. ?
Strange.
What am I missing ?
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #364 on: June 07, 2016, 09:11:04 PM »
Quote from: ProudModerate2 on June 07, 2016, 09:10:30 PM
I don't understand ...
How can Sanders win N.D. by such a huge margin, but yet Hillary is currently leading in S.D. ?
Strange.
What am I missing ?

Ones a caucus, ones a primary.
Logged
Oak Hills
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,076
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #365 on: June 07, 2016, 09:11:13 PM »
Quote from: ProudModerate2 on June 07, 2016, 09:10:30 PM
I don't understand ...
How can Sanders win N.D. by such a huge margin, but yet Hillary is currently leading in S.D. ?
Strange.
What am I missing ?

North Dakota is a caucus; South Dakota is a primary.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,769
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #366 on: June 07, 2016, 09:11:18 PM »
Quote from: IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi on June 07, 2016, 09:09:27 PM
Clinton true lead down to about 1.4 percent in South Dakota.  2/3rds in.

Where are you getting this "true lead" number?
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,809


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #367 on: June 07, 2016, 09:11:24 PM »
Quote from: realisticidealist on June 07, 2016, 09:08:22 PM
Clinton's lead in SD down to 5.84%. Falling, but not very quickly.

Now 5.54% with 58% in
Logged
#TheShadowyAbyss
TheShadowyAbyss
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,033
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -3.64

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #368 on: June 07, 2016, 09:11:35 PM »
Clinton 49%
Sanders 45%

Montana RN

Quote from: ProudModerate2 on June 07, 2016, 09:10:30 PM
I don't understand ...
How can Sanders win N.D. by such a huge margin, but yet Hillary is currently leading in S.D. ?
Strange.
What am I missing ?

Caucus.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #369 on: June 07, 2016, 09:11:43 PM »
Quote from: ProudModerate2 on June 07, 2016, 09:10:30 PM
I don't understand ...
How can Sanders win N.D. by such a huge margin, but yet Hillary is currently leading in S.D. ?
Strange.
What am I missing ?
SD hates good maps. Horrible State.
Logged
Gabagool102
Rookie
**
Posts: 244
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #370 on: June 07, 2016, 09:11:54 PM »
when will we be getting Montana's results?
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,831
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #371 on: June 07, 2016, 09:11:58 PM »
Clinton with a 49-45 lead in Montana!
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #372 on: June 07, 2016, 09:12:27 PM »
Clinton leading now in Montana with 5% of the vote in. ROFL
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #373 on: June 07, 2016, 09:12:44 PM »
Montana coming in with Clinton in the lead.
Logged
Illiniwek
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
Vatican City State



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #374 on: June 07, 2016, 09:12:50 PM »
Dear god if Hilldawg wins Montana....
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 47  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 10 queries.