There's no cheap land to buy anywhere that could expand America by the scale of the Louisiana Purchase.
If this is your reason for putting Jefferson so high, why isnt Andrew Johnson in the top 10 for purchasing Alaska?
Alaska was practically worthless for thirty years.
So? I ask the question again: If the scale of the Louisiana purchase, much of which wasnt worth anything for years, is the sole justification for putting Jefferson in the top rank, why not put Johnson next to him for Alaska?
Fugitive Slave Act.
Running on the bigoted (anti-immigrant, anti-Catholic) Know-Nothing ticket in 1856.
[/quote]
Fugitive Slave Act was an act of Congress, not an executive order; though it was part of an important sectional compromise achieved under Filmore.
His appearance in the 1856 election was after his presidency -- I thought you knew of some really bad stuff he did as president; plus doesn't seem any worse that several other candidates running on bigoted ticket at other times.
Is that really what you consider bad stuff? Compared to what has been done by a lot of other President's, seems weak justification for putting him at the bottom.
Full of? Really? I can think of a couple individuals at most.