I think you're just reading the wrong posts man, I've never seen this and I thought I was pretty "online" as far as these things go. Needless to say, we pro-choice men have nothing to be ashamed of with respect to this decision.
Abortion rights benefits men. None of us wants to be paying child support and dealing with an emotional cripple showing up at our doorsteps decades later due to a one night stand gone wrong.
Dude, that response is like a parody of what anti-abortion activists say pro-choice men think. Do better.
Nah, its just mask off. 90% of abortions are purely elective. The bro-choice "I have a right to consequence free sex" motivation lurks behind much of those reeeeeeing over this decision.
Everyone has a right to consequence free sex. Why should consensual sex have any 'consequences'? There is nothing shameful about it.
You could use your exact argument to advocate for banning condoms or birth control.
Can you please cite where that "right" to consequence free sex is written?
When did I suggest that this was a constitutional right? It's a fundamental right we all have as human beings.
But a fundamental right to life doesn't exist?
Not for anything that is not a legal person!
A blastocyst or an embryo has no more "right to life" than algae or a catfish.
Except it does when it's a human being. And using Ferguson97's own argument here, "legal" is irrelevant.
Oh my god, we get it! This isn't your bible study, you're going to have to put some effort into it if you want to have anything resembling a compelling point. Regurgitating these lines doesn't move anybody. You're wasting precious internet bandwidth by posting the same crap over and over and over again.
Please cite where I mentioned the Bible anywhere in my recent posts regarding abortion. I'll wait.
No one is forcing you to read. Don't like what I have to say? Move on. You're not exactly contributing anything to this discussion yourself, so you may want to think about that before pointing fingers.
