Do you support Biden’s move in Afghanistan
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 06:49:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Do you support Biden’s move in Afghanistan
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: .
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 123

Author Topic: Do you support Biden’s move in Afghanistan  (Read 1721 times)
Senator Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,731
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: 0.00

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: August 17, 2021, 04:03:44 PM »

I support his decision to remove US troops from Afghanistan, but it seems clear that the withdrawal was not planned or executed properly. It seems somewhere up the chain of command, likely the White House as the military certainly knew the situation "on the ground" was increasingly critical, it was assumed that there would be enough time before any possible government collapse to orderly (bureaucratically) process SIV applicants in Afghanistan without the need for Saigon-esque throngs of desperate civilians and packed evacuation flights.

This is my take on it too.
Logged
FrancoAgo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 662
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -6.66, S: -3.33

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: August 17, 2021, 05:24:58 PM »

No
and this is one of few wars, after WW2, i was in the same side of US
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,851
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: August 17, 2021, 06:49:10 PM »

Yes. This was a lose-lose situation from its inception by the Bush administration. Biden decided that he would be the one to take the initiative and stop playing the game of hot potato, that three previous administrations have been playing, and deal with the consequences that probably always were going to happen. The problem was that I don't think his administration anticipated the timing of how quickly the Taliban would undo twenty years of investment. I'm not entirely sure what he could have done differently.

I will, however, judge his administration on how seriously and competently they handle the evacuations of Americans and Afghan allies who want out, in particular this impending refugee crisis. I urge him and his administration not to give any mind to the inevitable bad faith Republican criticism of him "letting terrorists into the country again."
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: August 17, 2021, 09:00:38 PM »

I'm of two minds on this. On the one hand, I support Biden's decision to withdraw from Afghanistan. We were in that country for twenty years. We spent over a trillion dollars there, and over 2,000 American soldiers lost their lives. It's clear that all of our effort was for nought, and that the alternative to withdrawal would have been an eternal war against the Taliban. Biden, who is of the generation that fought in the Vietnam War, and who had began his political career during that military conflict, was clearly cognizant of the risks and skeptical of the benefits a continued presence in that country would have had for us. We should have gotten out of Afghanistan a decade ago, after Bin Laden was killed.

But on the other hand, I think the evacuation could have been handled much more competently than it was. Our intelligence apparatus clearly failed to accurately gauge the strength of the Taliban, and preparations were lacking on their part, as well as on the part of the Pentagon and of Biden's closest national security advisers. The withdrawal has been a public relations disaster, and it has further undermined our country's reputation in the eyes of the international community. It has also been of great distress to many who served in that country, and dedicated themselves there.
Logged
DINGO Joe
dingojoe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: August 17, 2021, 09:16:58 PM »

Oddly, it seems like one of the least violent weeks in the history of Afghanistan.
Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,333


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: August 17, 2021, 09:48:23 PM »

No and even you disagree, our withdrawal has been a completely avoidable dumpster fire due to his administration’s breathtaking incompetence and complete disregard for Afghan lives.  This is one of those moments that makes one truly ashamed of their country and the blood is on Biden’s hands.

Please explain what specifically the administration should have done differently to avoid the allegation of "breathtaking incompetence."

We are getting all our people out safely.  That seems pretty competent to me and nothing to be ashamed of.

The blood of Afghans was going to flow no matter what.  You can thank Pakistan for that.

Well, they could have considered burning documents and evacuating citizens/allies before the Taliban were within a few dozen miles of Kabul. Maybe they could have even abandoned Bagram Airfield after using it to evacuate their people instead of trying to withdraw over a hundred thousand people (including allies and their refugees) through Taliban territory to a single completely overwhelmed airport.

If they had been taking the evacuation as seriously as they are now from the start they could have safely evacuated well before this point. The bulk of the blame belongs to the inept permanent national security apparatus AKA the Deep State that couldn't properly execute a basic retreat, but since the bulk of Biden's supporters seem to think the Deep State is some wacky conspiracy theory it looks like he'll get saddled with the blame.
Logged
Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,450
Norway


P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: August 17, 2021, 10:06:11 PM »

Fully and enthusiastically.

However, if we take in a negligible number of refugees then I will be very disappointed.
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,391
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: August 17, 2021, 10:07:03 PM »

Absolutely not, and even if one approved of the decision to withdraw, the way it has been handled has been totally disastrous
Logged
Horus
Sheliak5
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,957
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: August 17, 2021, 10:13:03 PM »

Yes (normal)
Logged
😥
andjey
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,504
Ukraine
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: August 18, 2021, 01:09:14 AM »

Absolutely not, and even if one approved of the decision to withdraw, the way it has been handled has been totally disastrous
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,796
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: August 18, 2021, 01:34:39 AM »

After the Taliban has taken over Kabul, it's not a big deal, there are still droners inside Afghanistan anyways if they harbor terrorists, alot of refugees are leaving anyways, it's gonna be run just like Iraq
Logged
Meclazine for Israel
Meclazine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,078
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: August 18, 2021, 02:19:25 AM »
« Edited: August 18, 2021, 05:21:29 AM by Meclazine »

Yes.

I most definitely support Biden's decision. This occupation was not in the US' interest.

It's amazing how the media are biting him, yet history will vindicate him.
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,314
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: August 18, 2021, 09:48:28 AM »

Yes - conditional on us being able to safely evacuate all American citizens and Afghanis who helped us, and accepting as many refugees as we can.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,922
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: August 18, 2021, 10:07:20 AM »

Yup.

Nation building in a society like this isn't working unless large parts of the population actually want a change. That's not the case here. Why should we continue to send our men and women in harms way and spend trillions for few support among Afghans and a completely corrupt govt? We should now make sure certain people can safely exit, and that's it.
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: August 18, 2021, 10:30:12 AM »

Biden was supposed to do a surge and a five-year reoccupation, and call that "withdrawal."
Logged
American2020
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,512
Côte d'Ivoire


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: August 18, 2021, 10:59:05 AM »



Logged
GeneralMacArthur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,039
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: August 18, 2021, 01:50:37 PM »

No and even you disagree, our withdrawal has been a completely avoidable dumpster fire due to his administration’s breathtaking incompetence and complete disregard for Afghan lives.  This is one of those moments that makes one truly ashamed of their country and the blood is on Biden’s hands.

Please explain what specifically the administration should have done differently to avoid the allegation of "breathtaking incompetence."

We are getting all our people out safely.  That seems pretty competent to me and nothing to be ashamed of.

The blood of Afghans was going to flow no matter what.  You can thank Pakistan for that.

Well, they could have considered burning documents and evacuating citizens/allies before the Taliban were within a few dozen miles of Kabul. Maybe they could have even abandoned Bagram Airfield after using it to evacuate their people instead of trying to withdraw over a hundred thousand people (including allies and their refugees) through Taliban territory to a single completely overwhelmed airport.

If they had been taking the evacuation as seriously as they are now from the start they could have safely evacuated well before this point. The bulk of the blame belongs to the inept permanent national security apparatus AKA the Deep State that couldn't properly execute a basic retreat, but since the bulk of Biden's supporters seem to think the Deep State is some wacky conspiracy theory it looks like he'll get saddled with the blame.

They've been evacuating people.  The only Americans left in Afghanistan were the handful of embassy staff and 2,500 American troops, down from tens of thousands.  Tens of thousands of SIVs have already been evacuated.  You can ask why more weren't evacuated, but Biden addressed this in his speech -- many didn't want to, and the Afghan government instructed them not to do a mass evacuation.  Maybe he shouldn't have listened to the Afghan government and just done that anyway.  That's a fair criticism but it seems like a tough judgment call with lots of pros and cons on both sides, so it's not fair to label him a failure because he picked one side of it.

If any sensitive documents ended up in the hands of the Taliban, that's got to be the fault of some low-level folks who didn't follow standard operating procedure for secure information.  Every office with secure information has a shredder and whenever you evacuate an office you're supposed to take all that information with you or shred it.  My suspicion is that this is actually just mundane information that wasn't secure and wasn't worth shredding, and the media is hyping it up like the Taliban got all our state secrets.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,764
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: August 18, 2021, 02:00:10 PM »

No and even you disagree, our withdrawal has been a completely avoidable dumpster fire due to his administration’s breathtaking incompetence and complete disregard for Afghan lives.  This is one of those moments that makes one truly ashamed of their country and the blood is on Biden’s hands.

Please explain what specifically the administration should have done differently to avoid the allegation of "breathtaking incompetence."

We are getting all our people out safely.  That seems pretty competent to me and nothing to be ashamed of.

The blood of Afghans was going to flow no matter what.  You can thank Pakistan for that.

Well, they could have considered burning documents and evacuating citizens/allies before the Taliban were within a few dozen miles of Kabul. Maybe they could have even abandoned Bagram Airfield after using it to evacuate their people instead of trying to withdraw over a hundred thousand people (including allies and their refugees) through Taliban territory to a single completely overwhelmed airport.

If they had been taking the evacuation as seriously as they are now from the start they could have safely evacuated well before this point. The bulk of the blame belongs to the inept permanent national security apparatus AKA the Deep State that couldn't properly execute a basic retreat, but since the bulk of Biden's supporters seem to think the Deep State is some wacky conspiracy theory it looks like he'll get saddled with the blame.
It's not prudent to trust the media narrative uncritically. They've been sowing doubt and perpetuating lies and shamelessly omitting facts.
Logged
pppolitics
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,926


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: August 18, 2021, 02:26:45 PM »

100%
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,796
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: August 18, 2021, 02:32:06 PM »

As I have always said that Biden at 47(/47 it's gonna hurt in our H and wave insurance Senate Seats where the Gulf states are, where our military is and just like Persian Gulf both of them cause damage to Environment due to FRACKING
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.243 seconds with 12 queries.