reilly is a bad candidate too, phil. i really like him as a person. but he isnt a natural born politician. to say he is gaffe prone would be an understatement.
I thought he was a popular AG. He also has the best name recognition, too. Wouldn't facing off against Patrick be easier?
reilly is reasonably popular. most of that is just personal popularity. reilly is a likable guy. he is a very decent guy who has had to work hard for everything in his life. people look at him as 'one of us'. but at the same time, that can be a bad thing. a lot of people think of him as a bumbling lightweight.
reilly also isnt very popular with the liberal wing of the democrat party. they question his committment to the liberal agenda. personally, i dont think reilly is very liberal at all. all of the liberal positions he takes (like gay marriage) just seem contrived and insincere.
would patrick be easier? probably for two reasons:
1. he is an outspoken liberal. many voters want a 'check' on the democrat and liberal legislature. i also think a lot of blue collars will vote for mihos if patrick is the nominee.
2. race is an issue (unfortunately)
on the other hand, patrick is probably a more polished candidate than reilly.