What does the LA election tell us about the remaining 2023 races? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 15, 2024, 10:22:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  What does the LA election tell us about the remaining 2023 races? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What does the LA election tell us about the remaining 2023 races?  (Read 1570 times)
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,248
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

« on: October 15, 2023, 01:10:30 PM »

Not 2023 races, but those black belt seats that are low dd Biden are not safe
Logged
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,248
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2023, 02:07:10 PM »

MS - Likely R -> Safe R
KY - Lean D -> Lean D

VA SD 24 - Tossup -> Tilt R

Agree with all of this.  It likely means MS won't even be close and VA R's now have more upside south of Richmond.  No reason to change KY, though.

I'm quite confused as to why people are making such changes, considering this isn't about "oh minority turnout is low" .... there is a reason here, and a lot of context, that does not crossover to pretty much any race.

The bottom line in LA is that Democrats did not invest. There wasn't a turnout operation; given how awful NOLA turnout was. Wilson barely had money; Landry did. RGA spent, DGA didn't. This isn't very hard to understand. 2022 showed us that were Dems *did* invest, they did pretty well. That's why LA is nothing like VA, KY, even MS at this point, given all those states are getting somewhat of a level of investment for GOTV from Democrats, while LA didn't. That's pretty much what this boils down to.

Exactly why FL-GOV was a mess for Democrats last year. They just didn't even try.
Charlie Crist was literally the governor of the state for 4 years, was the gubernatorial nominee in 2014, ran for Senate in 2010 and served in Congress for Six years. He had massive name recognition and should have had a floor of at least 45% without even trying!
Logged
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,248
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2023, 04:15:06 PM »

It’s a good sign for Reeves in Mississippi, but I can’t really extrapolate anything out of Kentucky, as that state has a very tiny black population.

In Virginia I’d say it’s a bad sign for Dems in racially polarized rural seats like SD-17 and HD-82 but less meaningful in suburban seats with sizable black minorities like SD-24 and HD-97.

I feel like people are simply ignoring what's happening here. Why are we extrapolating out of this when Democrats *are* putting money and effort into VA and MS?

Democrats did not put anything into making black voters turnout in LA. That is clearly not the case in VA and MS. So why are we comparing these two?

Agreed.  It is pretty clear that certain folks are tying themselves in knots desperately trying to justify their pre-existing doomer and Republican wishcasting narratives and simply ignoring any facts or analysis that doesn’t fit neatly into the narratives they’re pushing.
Polling (showing Trump gaining massively with black voters) and every single 2022/2023 result in the South points to the black belt collapsing for Biden in 2024.

Most of the polling showed Republicans gaining with black voters in 2022 too, and it did not happen.
It's not 2022, It's 2023 and we just had an election where the black belt in LA collapsed. Election Results are much more indicitive than polling.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.