Rate the Presidents, Installment #36: Lyndon B. Johnson
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 10:00:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Rate the Presidents, Installment #36: Lyndon B. Johnson
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: How would you rate Lyndon B. Johnson as a President?
#1
✯✯✯✯✯
 
#2
✯✯✯✯
 
#3
✯✯✯
 
#4
✯✯
 
#5
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 51

Author Topic: Rate the Presidents, Installment #36: Lyndon B. Johnson  (Read 2141 times)
Potus
Potus2036
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,841


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: July 12, 2015, 06:27:36 PM »

Terrible person. Terrible economics. Flawed strategy in Vietnam that allow communism to expand. He just took advantage of years of hard work by true egalitarians. I can't give him credit for his civil rights legislation.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,861


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: July 12, 2015, 06:28:57 PM »

The best president with the last name "Johnson."
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,139


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: July 12, 2015, 10:17:47 PM »

Terrible on everything but civil rights, and even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was largely the product of Everett Dirksen rather than LBJ. He also voted against all civil rights acts prior to 1957 and watered the 1957 act down to almost nothing. One star.

Dirksen played an important part in getting Congressional Republicans on board with the CRA, but he was by no means the central player. Getting civil rights through Congress was a group effort in which LBJ, Dirksen, and Hubert Humphrey all played key parts.

That said, if you're going to lay sole blame for Vietnam on LBJ, you also need to give him credit for the Civil Rights Act.
Logged
PJ
Politics Junkie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,794
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: July 13, 2015, 12:00:39 AM »
« Edited: July 13, 2015, 02:45:51 PM by PJ »

His domestic policy (civil rights, war on poverty, immigration reform) was excellent, but escalating the Vietnam War and using conscription to do so was atrocious. Two stars, because while there is a lot of good, the bad definitely outweighs it.

Vietnam was, of course, horrific, but there's an argument to be made that it was necessary in order to win support for his domestic programs at home - and the significance of those really cannot be understated.

And that argument is terrible. This is the Vietnam War, not something with few ramifications like KXL or the confederate flag. You can't just trade it with some other reforms in order to justify it.
Logged
Cryptic
Shadowlord88
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 891


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: July 13, 2015, 04:24:47 AM »

3 stars. He was great on civil rights and had an excellent domestic program, but the Vietnam War weights against him.
Logged
Anti-Bothsidesism
Somenamelessfool
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 719
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: July 13, 2015, 07:54:54 AM »

Domestic Program was on the whole good-a whole raft of civil rights bills were passed from housing to voting. Likewise his great society project, has to be praised including the expansion in social security. 

Foreign Policy however was awful
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: July 13, 2015, 09:17:20 AM »

As a president, average.  As a person, horrendous.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: July 13, 2015, 09:18:46 AM »

Terrible on everything but civil rights, and even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was largely the product of Everett Dirksen rather than LBJ. He also voted against all civil rights acts prior to 1957 and watered the 1957 act down to almost nothing. One star.

Didn't Evertt Dirksen literally have to be dragged to the 1964 civil rights bill?
No; segregationist Democrats filibustered it, and it was mostly Republicans who did the heavy lifting in Congress.  In terms of percentages, Republicans supported it more than Democrats.
Logged
JonathanSwift
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,122
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: July 13, 2015, 09:49:38 AM »

Final Result: 2.53 Stars
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,862
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: July 13, 2015, 10:23:50 AM »

Both forms of LBJ revisionism are ridiculous. He was a complex and contradictory man who's record in office was equally complex and contradictory.
Logged
YaBoyNY
NYMillennial
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,469
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: July 13, 2015, 01:26:05 PM »

Terrible on everything but civil rights, and even the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was largely the product of Everett Dirksen rather than LBJ. He also voted against all civil rights acts prior to 1957 and watered the 1957 act down to almost nothing. One star.

Lmfao historical revisionism at its finest.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,545
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: July 13, 2015, 09:00:38 PM »

4*

Vietnam cost him a star for me.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.238 seconds with 12 queries.