To all non-Ron Paul Republicans

[fezzyfestoon]

Yeah, I think so.

[fezzyfestoon]

Jindal? Are you referring to the same Jindal who displayed the intellectual capacity of a fifth-grader in his much-hyped "response" video a few months ago?

Romney is cunning, but no intellectual.

Gingrich is a just a political hack.

Right, an undergraduate valedictorian and cum laude graduate of Harvard Business AND Law School is not an intellectual.

[fezzyfestoon]

Jindal? Are you referring to the same Jindal who displayed the intellectual capacity of a fifth-grader in his much-hyped "response" video a few months ago?

Romney is cunning, but no intellectual.

Gingrich is a just a political hack.

Right, an undergraduate valedictorian and cum laude graduate of Harvard Business AND Law School is not an intellectual.

G.W. Bush has a Harvard MBA too. What's your point?

Hahaha, if that point wasn't successfully understood, I think we found where the lack of intellect is.

[fezzyfestoon]

Jindal, the Rhodes Scholar.  I don't believe an underwhelming speech should have such a large bearing on a person's intellectual capacity.

Maybe you and I have different understandings of what constitutes an "intellectual".  I put a lot of emphasis on level and quality of education,

Education doesn't make one an intellectual. One must be capable of critical thinking, not just regurgitating facts. Jindal deciding to scapegoat volcano monitoring as the source of America's budget deficit was an embarrassment. The juvenile tone of voice just added insult to injury for the GOP.

I'm going to go out on a limb in assuming this character isn't a product of higher education.

[fezzyfestoon]

Jindal? Are you referring to the same Jindal who displayed the intellectual capacity of a fifth-grader in his much-hyped "response" video a few months ago?

Romney is cunning, but no intellectual.

Gingrich is a just a political hack.

Right, an undergraduate valedictorian and cum laude graduate of Harvard Business AND Law School is not an intellectual.

G.W. Bush has a Harvard MBA too. What's your point?

Bush was never able to exhibit the fruits of his education in the real world.  Romney, on the other hand, has done so in leaps and bounds.  A fact which you obviously choose to ignore.

So Romney may be a good businessman and skilled politician. That makes him the intellectual leader of the Republican Party? What fresh new ideas has this great intellectual come up with?

The requirement for being intellectual is originality in politics?  This is news to me.

Anyway, Romney's entire approach to governing is his "fresh new idea".  Governing based on business principles hasn't been done in decades upon decades.  His entire concept of executive office is completely different than anything we've heard from a major candidate in a long time.  Then there's the issue that no one in American national politics has offered much in the way of originality for as long as I can remember.

And again, if you think you can be unintelligent and graduate with honors from Harvard's Business and Law schools, we've successfully determined who lacks intellect.  And I reiterate my point that one clearly has not attained a higher education if they think that's the case.

[fezzyfestoon]

Ok, go ahead and keep moving the goalposts, maybe you'll "win" something eventually.

Romney's not intellectual!
Well, he hasn't used his intellect, so he's not really!
But he hasn't come up with any new ideas!
So that doesn't make him the intellectual leader of the party!

[fezzyfestoon]

But prove me wrong, let's hear all the "fresh new ideas" Romney is putting forth.

Ok, go ahead and keep moving the goalposts, maybe you'll "win" something eventually.

Romney's not intellectual!
Well, he hasn't used his intellect, so he's not really!
But he hasn't come up with any new ideas!
So that doesn't make him the intellectual leader of the party!

What a surprise, you came up with nothing.

Perhaps you are not familiar with the pointlessness of arguing with someone who moves the goalposts.  Every time I make a point, you change what I have to prove.  I have no interest in engaging in such a fruitless labor.

[fezzyfestoon]

Perhaps you are not familiar with the pointlessness of arguing with someone who moves the goalposts.  Every time I make a point, you change what I have to prove.  I have no interest in engaging in such a fruitless labor.

Just keep flailing around, fezzy. I see you debate about as well as that slimeball Romney does. Fortunately neither you nor him have a chance of becoming president. 

Bahaha, this dude is too much.