Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 13, 2024, 04:04:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 32
Author Topic: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)  (Read 28169 times)
izixs
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,277
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.31, S: -6.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #375 on: March 26, 2016, 05:48:16 PM »

The Berniebots celebrating this Alaska win reminds me of the Romney supporters clapping and cheering when Alaska was called for them, even though they had already lost the election an hour ago.

No need to be salty just because Sanders won a state.

I'm not salty. I'm just annoyed at delusional Berniebots who act as if their hero and savior can still win this race when it's clearly over.

While they're annoyed at constantly being called Bernibots. Maybe the animosity can be fixed by not insulting people constantly.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,802


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #376 on: March 26, 2016, 05:49:44 PM »

The Berniebots celebrating this Alaska win reminds me of the Romney supporters clapping and cheering when Alaska was called for them, even though they had already lost the election an hour ago.

No need to be salty just because Sanders won a state.

I'm not salty. I'm just annoyed at delusional Berniebots who act as if their hero and savior can still win this race when it's clearly over.

While they're annoyed at constantly being called Bernibots. Maybe the animosity can be fixed by not insulting people constantly.

Well, at least it's not as bad as "BernieBro", but yeah, it seems like attacking Bernie supporters is the cool thing among 3rd wayers. Bill Clinton compared us to the Tea Party.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #377 on: March 26, 2016, 05:50:09 PM »


ahahahahahahahahaha You don't realize how ridiculous you sound, do you?

'BERNIE DID WELL WITH MINORITIES!!!!'

- 'When and Where?'

- 'WITH...UH... BLACKS!!!'

- 'Wait... what? Where?'

- 'IN...... UH........ VERMONT!'
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,802


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #378 on: March 26, 2016, 05:51:46 PM »
« Edited: March 26, 2016, 05:53:22 PM by ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ »


ahahahahahahahahaha You don't realize how ridiculous you sound, do you?

'BERNIE DID WELL WITH MINORITIES!!!!'

- 'When and Where?'

- 'WITH...UH... BLACKS!!!'

- 'Wait... what? Where?'

- 'IN...... UH........ VERMONT!'

Dude, I was just refuting the obviously false statement that Hillary won union members in every state. Of course Bernie won Vermont union members (as well as those in many other states) if he even won Vermont blacks. My point wasn't about blacks, but the idea that Hillary won Vermont union members is completely absurd.
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #379 on: March 26, 2016, 05:51:55 PM »


ahahahahahahahahaha You don't realize how ridiculous you sound, do you?

'BERNIE DID WELL WITH MINORITIES!!!!'

- 'When and Where?'

- 'WITH...UH... BLACKS!!!'

- 'Wait... what? Where?'

- 'IN...... UH........ VERMONT!'

Do you feel this annoyed because Clinton is not doing so well in these states or because you feel the campaign you support is potentially threatened and could have the nomination swept from under in a reverse sweep a la southern Clinton states?
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,669
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #380 on: March 26, 2016, 05:53:15 PM »


ahahahahahahahahaha You don't realize how ridiculous you sound, do you?

'BERNIE DID WELL WITH MINORITIES!!!!'

- 'When and Where?'

- 'WITH...UH... BLACKS!!!'

- 'Wait... what? Where?'

- 'IN...... UH........ VERMONT!'

Do you feel this annoyed because Clinton is not doing so well in these states or because you feel the campaign you support is potentially threatened and could have the nomination swept from under in a reverse sweep a la southern Clinton states?

Even if Bernie swept the remaining states (impossible because of NY & MD) he still wouldn't win.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #381 on: March 26, 2016, 05:53:34 PM »

Kitsap County 2008: 70% Obama
Kitsap County 2016: 73% Sanders
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #382 on: March 26, 2016, 05:53:53 PM »


ahahahahahahahahaha You don't realize how ridiculous you sound, do you?

'BERNIE DID WELL WITH MINORITIES!!!!'

- 'When and Where?'

- 'WITH...UH... BLACKS!!!'

- 'Wait... what? Where?'

- 'IN...... UH........ VERMONT!'

Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,540
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #383 on: March 26, 2016, 05:54:28 PM »

Grant County 2008: Obama 55.1%
Grant County 2008: Sanders 78.9%
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #384 on: March 26, 2016, 05:54:48 PM »

Grant County goes Sanders 79-20
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #385 on: March 26, 2016, 05:54:51 PM »


ahahahahahahahahaha You don't realize how ridiculous you sound, do you?

'BERNIE DID WELL WITH MINORITIES!!!!'

- 'When and Where?'

- 'WITH...UH... BLACKS!!!'

- 'Wait... what? Where?'

- 'IN...... UH........ VERMONT!'

Do you feel this annoyed because Clinton is not doing so well in these states or because you feel the campaign you support is potentially threatened and could have the nomination swept from under in a reverse sweep a la southern Clinton states?

Even if Bernie swept the remaining states (impossible because of NY & MD) he still wouldn't win.

I understand that, outside a ridiculous change in the remaining states, the primary is done, but how else do you explain such aggressive responses?
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #386 on: March 26, 2016, 05:56:48 PM »

Grant County 2008: 55% Obama
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #387 on: March 26, 2016, 05:57:01 PM »


ahahahahahahahahaha You don't realize how ridiculous you sound, do you?

'BERNIE DID WELL WITH MINORITIES!!!!'

- 'When and Where?'

- 'WITH...UH... BLACKS!!!'

- 'Wait... what? Where?'

- 'IN...... UH........ VERMONT!'

Do you feel this annoyed because Clinton is not doing so well in these states or because you feel the campaign you support is potentially threatened and could have the nomination swept from under in a reverse sweep a la southern Clinton states?

Such a reverse sweep isn't happening and you know it. NY, PA, CA, MD, DE and NJ aren't 90%+ White so Bernie won't win there. I don't give a sh*t about Clinton losing Alaska, Montana or Idaho lol.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,974
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #388 on: March 26, 2016, 05:58:03 PM »

I'm prepared to hold my nose and vote for either candidate in November, but let's dispel with this fiction that Clinton is more electable than Sanders. The polls simply prove that wrong. The only two things Hillary has going for her in GE electability are support from neocons (who are starting to openly endorse her) and the fact that her reputation among independents is so damaged that even the dirtiest attacks from Trump cannot make it any worse. (which is actually quite a compelling argument in her favor, but still)
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #389 on: March 26, 2016, 05:58:13 PM »


ahahahahahahahahaha You don't realize how ridiculous you sound, do you?

'BERNIE DID WELL WITH MINORITIES!!!!'

- 'When and Where?'

- 'WITH...UH... BLACKS!!!'

- 'Wait... what? Where?'

- 'IN...... UH........ VERMONT!'

Do you feel this annoyed because Clinton is not doing so well in these states or because you feel the campaign you support is potentially threatened and could have the nomination swept from under in a reverse sweep a la southern Clinton states?

Such a reverse sweep isn't happening and you know it. NY, PA, CA, MD, DE and NJ aren't 90%+ White so Bernie won't win there. I don't give a sh*t about Clinton losing Alaska, Montana or Idaho lol.

Then maybe try bringing it down to like a 4. You're currently at an 8.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #390 on: March 26, 2016, 05:58:53 PM »


ahahahahahahahahaha You don't realize how ridiculous you sound, do you?

'BERNIE DID WELL WITH MINORITIES!!!!'

- 'When and Where?'

- 'WITH...UH... BLACKS!!!'

- 'Wait... what? Where?'

- 'IN...... UH........ VERMONT!'

Do you feel this annoyed because Clinton is not doing so well in these states or because you feel the campaign you support is potentially threatened and could have the nomination swept from under in a reverse sweep a la southern Clinton states?

Such a reverse sweep isn't happening and you know it. NY, PA, CA, MD, DE and NJ aren't 90%+ White so Bernie won't win there. I don't give a sh*t about Clinton losing Alaska, Montana or Idaho lol.

Then maybe try bringing it down to like a 4. You're currently at an 8.

Just saying, sodium intake at this level could be fatal.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,802


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #391 on: March 26, 2016, 05:59:27 PM »

Such a reverse sweep isn't happening and you know it. NY, PA, CA, MD, DE and NJ aren't 90%+ White so Bernie won't win there. I don't give a sh*t about Clinton losing Alaska, Montana or Idaho lol.

Alaska is only 62% non Hispanic white. Bernie is probably winning the Native population big time.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #392 on: March 26, 2016, 05:59:41 PM »

I'm prepared to hold my nose and vote for either candidate in November, but let's dispel with this fiction that Clinton is more electable than Sanders. The polls simply prove that wrong. The only two things Hillary has going for her in GE electability are support from neocons (who are starting to openly endorse her) and the fact that her reputation among independents is so damaged that even the dirtiest attacks from Trump cannot make it any worse. (which is actually quite a compelling argument in her favor, but still)

The only thing polls prove is how much people care or don't care about polls. It's still way too early to get anything of value out of them.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #393 on: March 26, 2016, 06:02:12 PM »

Skagit County 2008: 70% Obama
Skagit County 2016: 74% Sanders
Logged
Comrade Funk
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,216
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.16, S: -5.91

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #394 on: March 26, 2016, 06:03:08 PM »

Such a reverse sweep isn't happening and you know it. NY, PA, CA, MD, DE and NJ aren't 90%+ White so Bernie won't win there. I don't give a sh*t about Clinton losing Alaska, Montana or Idaho lol.

Alaska is only 62% non Hispanic white. Bernie is probably winning the Native population big time.
They must be Republicans
Logged
Pragmatic Conservative
1184AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,735


Political Matrix
E: 3.00, S: -0.41

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #395 on: March 26, 2016, 06:03:48 PM »

Skagit County Sanders 74-26
Jefferson County Sanders 71-29
Island County Sanders 69-31
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #396 on: March 26, 2016, 06:04:11 PM »

Assuming they are correct in this, this probably bodes well for Sanders in Hawaii:

Benchmark Politics ‏@benchmarkpol  2m2 minutes ago
Precinct 1930 and 1932, both in one of the most asian areas of Seattle, went 70-75% Sanders.
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,569
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #397 on: March 26, 2016, 06:04:23 PM »

Such a reverse sweep isn't happening and you know it. NY, PA, CA, MD, DE and NJ aren't 90%+ White so Bernie won't win there. I don't give a sh*t about Clinton losing Alaska, Montana or Idaho lol.

Alaska is only 62% non Hispanic white. Bernie is probably winning the Native population big time.

Those aren't certified Hillary Minorities™, so therefore they dont count.
Logged
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #398 on: March 26, 2016, 06:04:33 PM »

I'm prepared to hold my nose and vote for either candidate in November, but let's dispel with this fiction that Clinton is more electable than Sanders. The polls simply prove that wrong. The only two things Hillary has going for her in GE electability are support from neocons (who are starting to openly endorse her) and the fact that her reputation among independents is so damaged that even the dirtiest attacks from Trump cannot make it any worse. (which is actually quite a compelling argument in her favor, but still)

You are joking, right? Those polls don't mean sh*t as Sanders has never been attacked from Hillary or the Republicans.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #399 on: March 26, 2016, 06:07:35 PM »

I'm prepared to hold my nose and vote for either candidate in November, but let's dispel with this fiction that Clinton is more electable than Sanders. The polls simply prove that wrong. The only two things Hillary has going for her in GE electability are support from neocons (who are starting to openly endorse her) and the fact that her reputation among independents is so damaged that even the dirtiest attacks from Trump cannot make it any worse. (which is actually quite a compelling argument in her favor, but still)

You are joking, right? Those polls don't mean sh*t as Sanders has never been attacked from Hillary or the Republicans.

Yes, he has. Sure, he hasn't been attacked as much as Clinton has, but he's definitely been attacked.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 ... 32  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.06 seconds with 12 queries.