How did 2020 reshape the electoral map? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 12:33:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  How did 2020 reshape the electoral map? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How did 2020 reshape the electoral map?  (Read 570 times)
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,859


« on: November 10, 2020, 05:05:45 PM »
« edited: November 10, 2020, 05:24:09 PM by ProgressiveModerate »

In 2016, the rust belt was revealed to be more competative than initially thought, while states like GA, TX, and AZ were revealed to have potential to be competative down the road

2012 barely redefined the electoral map frankly

In 2008, it was revealed Democrats could win in all these places like VA, NC, CO, and NV, which were previously thought as pipe dreams


I personally feel like after seeing the 2020 results, GA is definately going to be a highly competative state, and will likely start becoming more blue the next few cycles. I also think 2020 revealed MN isn't going to be swinging hard right anytime soon barring some massive re-alignment, Minneapolis grounds the state for now. VA and CO are both officially safe states, and NM may have been bumped down to likely. I also think 2020 showed that Democrats don't appear to have much of a future in OH and IA. I would also say that NE-2 seems to be pretty reliably D after 2020, but we don't quite know what the GOP will do to the district

2016 left us off with a map that looked something like this in a normal cycle:



And I feel like 2020 leaves us with a map that looks like this in a normal cycle:

Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,859


« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2020, 05:19:57 PM »

FL at least lean r in a normal cycle

I’m not sure sure about that yet. FL may have just been a Trump thing like the Midwest was an Obama thing. 2024 should offer a clear picture of whether FL really is gone for Ds
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,859


« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2020, 05:29:55 PM »

well obviously the biggest takeaways are that Arizona and Georgia are the New Democratic frontline targets.  These are states that have been trending Dem for years and could become part of a new blue wall.  I don't think it's safe to say that any other Republican can play as well as Trump did in MI and PA and he still lost.  I think the new battleground is MI/PA/MN/AZ/GA/NC.  OH/IA are gone from the battleground.  FL/TX are probably second tier unless there's further evidence of Texas trending. 

I agree, though I would replace WI with MN on that list of top battlegrounds.

As for TX, it clearly is still shifting less; Biden saw big swings in areas of the state that weren't the Rio Grande valley, and the Rio Grande valley isn't going to continue trending right at a rate of 30 points per cycle (though it probably continues it's rightwards trend overall).
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,859


« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2020, 05:37:31 PM »

well obviously the biggest takeaways are that Arizona and Georgia are the New Democratic frontline targets.  These are states that have been trending Dem for years and could become part of a new blue wall.  I don't think it's safe to say that any other Republican can play as well as Trump did in MI and PA and he still lost.  I think the new battleground is MI/PA/MN/AZ/GA/NC.  OH/IA are gone from the battleground.  FL/TX are probably second tier unless there's further evidence of Texas trending. 

I agree, though I would replace WI with MN on that list of top battlegrounds.

As for TX, it clearly is still shifting less; Biden saw big swings in areas of the state that weren't the Rio Grande valley, and the Rio Grande valley isn't going to continue trending right at a rate of 30 points per cycle (though it probably continues it's rightwards trend overall).

I guess I am assuming that WI was so razor thin that it will trend enough for the GOP, but maybe that's not a fair assumption. 

I almost guarentee you WI vote at least a point or 2 to the right of the nation in 2024, but the PV is prolly Lean D by default at this point so it cancels out.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,859


« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2020, 08:33:50 PM »

I feel like Pennsylvania and especially Michigan are uniquely good fits for Trump.

I think for other canidates they are Likely D states.

I think Arizona and eventually Georgia are trending permanent D. While only losing Ohio.

We might actually have a shot by 2024 in Texas

Thus, the electoral college is trending more fair

Well, we'll also have to see how reapportionment goes. I am going to flip a s*** if Florida gains more than one elector. Meanwhile I will pop champagne if Florida loses any.

FL almost certainly gains 1, and prolly 2. If it doesn't gain 2 this time, it's definately getting it come 2030
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,859


« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2020, 08:34:10 PM »

I feel like Pennsylvania and especially Michigan are uniquely good fits for Trump.

I think for other canidates they are Likely D states.

I think Arizona and eventually Georgia are trending permanent D. While only losing Ohio.

We might actually have a shot by 2024 in Texas

Thus, the electoral college is trending more fair

Wow, I've never seen you so optimistic!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 13 queries.