Hypothetical Presidential Election 1968: RFK vs. Rockefeller (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 04:52:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Hypothetical Presidential Election 1968: RFK vs. Rockefeller (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Robert F. Kennedy (Democratic)
 
#2
Nelson Rockefeller (Republican)
 
#3
George Wallace (American Independent)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 52

Author Topic: Hypothetical Presidential Election 1968: RFK vs. Rockefeller  (Read 1494 times)
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


« on: April 17, 2016, 05:40:20 PM »

You folks know you can't openly admit you'd vote for Wallace. That's why we have secret ballots.
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2016, 07:39:33 AM »


What was the main draw to Wallace?  I'm assuming it's not his economically populist campaign or his desire to get out of Vietnam ... just love that racism?

Wasn't Wallace a hawk in regards to Vietnam?
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2016, 07:04:43 PM »


What was the main draw to Wallace?  I'm assuming it's not his economically populist campaign or his desire to get out of Vietnam ... just love that racism?

Wasn't Wallace a hawk in regards to Vietnam?

I feel like that's pretty rumored to be true now a days, but I remember reading that he said he had a strict 90-day window before all troops were withdrawn if the war wasn't winnable (and most Americans weren't seeing it as a winnable war by 1968).

That's pretty Dovish compared to Johnson and Scoop Jackson. So he wasn't in the hawkish wing of the Democratic party. That's the thing about George Wallace. I really don't believe that he actually believed a damn word he said. The segregation, the race-baiting, the economic populism, I think that was all just political opportunism.

When it boils down to it, I don't think Wallace was a racist. A despicable opportunist who used racism to gain power, yes. But a through and through white supremacist? I have a hard time believing that.
Logged
White Trash
Southern Gothic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,910


« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2016, 07:31:05 PM »

When it boils down to it, I don't think Wallace was a racist. A despicable opportunist who used racism to gain power, yes. But a through and through white supremacist? I have a hard time believing that.
Does it really matter, though? I mean, whether you deny blacks equal rights because you're racist or because you're a power-hungry b*stard with no principles makes little difference to the people who stand to suffer for those policies.

Oh no, I totally agree. It's just strange to think that Wallace could've been two steps to the left of McGovern if given the right circumstances. If Montgomery, Alabama had the demographics and views of Frisco Bay, then Wallace could've made Hunter S. Thompson look like Barry Goldwater.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.