Some of you seemed t be making reference to the quality of the candidate in addition to the margin the candidate might achieve. I was referencing the quality of the candidates. Warren will only amass her larger total due to unwavering ideological position in a very Democrat state. By electing Republican Governors it seems that the citizens of Massachusetts know they are otherwise likely to elect a crazy or crooked or wild spending Democrat legislature or Governor.
Funny how you make accusations of partisan statements when you are making them yourself, because clearly the reason a Republican Governor in a liberal state would be so popular and win by so much is because the voters know all Democratic politicians are crazy, crooked or wild spenders. That's why the state is so Democratic, right?
No I am not saying that. I am not saying bad things do not happen were Republicans are entrenched. And I am not saying there are not crazy Republicans running around. But I do believe big cities dominated by one political party tend to create approtunities for greater graft. The last big city Republican machine in Philadelphia met its death by the early 50s.
In large states with strong two parties it is a little easier to control the graft and craziness with swings.
I think New York and California are going to have more difficulties as the GOP weakens.
I do not believe all liberal and Democrats are involved in graft or crazy. I just disagree with you on most policies.
the lst rep gov form ca, from the god himself-
https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2017/02/02/trump-pray-arnold-schwarzenegger-and-apprentice/97393142/http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2028599,00.html
Poll
