Should the IDS abandon imperial nomenclature? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 10:29:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Should the IDS abandon imperial nomenclature? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should the IDS abandon imperial nomenclature?
#1
Yes (IDS resident)
#2
No (IDS resident)
#3
Yes (Non-IDS resident)
#4
No (Non-IDS resident)
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Author Topic: Should the IDS abandon imperial nomenclature?  (Read 1824 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,194
United States


« on: May 24, 2013, 02:08:33 AM »
     The capital has always officially been Memphis. I remember the Charleston movement and the Governor's Plantation well, but our attempt to make it official ended in failure.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,194
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2013, 11:43:51 PM »
     The opposition to moving the capital had nothing to do with location. It was because we had already spent billions to create a government complex in Memphis. Abandoning it for somewhere else would be irresponsible usage of taxpayer dollars.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.