How would you vote on California's propositions? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 10:52:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  How would you vote on California's propositions? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How would you vote on California's propositions?  (Read 1098 times)
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,342
United States


« on: October 22, 2016, 12:37:04 AM »
« edited: October 22, 2016, 01:03:44 AM by Ralleytand »

Prop 51- Yes
Prop 52- Yes
Prop 53- No
Prop 54- No

Prop 55- Yes
Prop 56- Yes
Prop 57- Yes

Prop 58- No
Prop 59- Yes
Prop 60- Yes
Prop 61- Yes
Prop 62- No
Prop 63- Yes
Prop 64- Yes
Prop 65- No
Prop 66- Yes
Prop 67- Yes
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,342
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2016, 12:14:57 AM »

51: Yes
52: Yes
53: No
54: Yes (with hesitation)
55: No
56: Yes
57: Yes
58: Yes
59: No
60: Yes
61: Yes
62: No**
63: No
64: No
65: Yes
66: Yes
67: No

*This is a good idea in theory, but requiring a statewide vote on local bonds is completely unnecessary.

**Although I oppose the death penalty and support this in theory, I believe that Prop 66 is a more mainstream solution.  At this point, reforming the death penalty seems better to me than repeal.

†I support background checks for gun purchases, but if someone has already passed the background check for the gun, then they shouldn't have to go through another to buy ammunition.

Plastic shopping bags are completely reusable and recyclable, and in fact are frequently reused by many people, myself included.  Prop 65 seems like a much more reasonable measure here.

This refers to "single use", and easily torn ones that still get easily discarded (even if they can be resused and recycled, the latter of which is still not a harmless process) and end up swirling around in the Pacific Ocean in an area bigger than Texas. Obviously we banned it for firmer, more intuitive bags and so far, *gasp* it's come out just fine.

In short Prop 65 is pointless moderate heroism at best, regressive at worst.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.