Where should the next MLB expansion teams be placed? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 04:39:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Where should the next MLB expansion teams be placed? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Where should the next MLB expansion teams be placed?
#1
Austin, TX
 
#2
Buffalo
 
#3
Charlotte
 
#4
Indianapolis
 
#5
Inland Empire, CA
 
#6
Jacksonville
 
#7
Las Vegas
 
#8
Louisville, KY
 
#9
Memphis
 
#10
Montreal
 
#11
Nashville
 
#12
New Orleans
 
#13
Oklahoma City
 
#14
Orlando
 
#15
Ottawa
 
#16
Portland
 
#17
Sacramento
 
#18
Salt Lake City
 
#19
San Antonio
 
#20
Vancouver
 
#21
another NYC/NJ team
 
#22
Mexico City
 
#23
Monterrey, Mexico
 
#24
San Juan, PR
 
#25
Havana, Cuba
 
#26
somewhere else (please state)
 
#27
No more expansion
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 38

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Where should the next MLB expansion teams be placed?  (Read 8886 times)
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,562
Ukraine


« on: April 27, 2014, 01:37:38 PM »

Inspired by some discussion in the baseball thread.

I picked Charlotte and Nashville, although Havana would be the best if the government could work it out. It would probably set attendance records.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,562
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2014, 07:02:10 PM »

Expansion is off the table, and for good reason. There are enough teams as it is. Montreal is the only market that might warrant a team, and the only potential candidate for relocation is Tampa Bay, since San Diego and Miami both have fairly new parks.

How would 32 teams as opposed to 30 hurt anything? The overall talent pool has increased thanks to population increase, more countries caring about baseball, and increasing specialized youth coaching. A player who could just barely make to MLB in 1998 (when it expanded to 30) couldn't make it today.

With that argument off the table, there's really no reason not to expand if it could be profitable, and there's definitely markets where it could be.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,562
Ukraine


« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2014, 08:20:30 PM »

In general, I'm strongly against teams moving, because it's just not right to rip out the hearts of the fans like that. I think that any team that just insists on moving should have to do like the Cleveland Browns and leave the name and history behind. Why should banners won in Seattle be hanging in Oklahoma City, or titles won in Minneapolis or Houston be celebrated in Dallas and Nashville? The new fans didn't care about those old days. It was really stupid that the Titans got to wear Oilers throwback jerseys on the AFL 50th anniversary year, instead of the Texans, whose fans actually cared about the Oilers...

Having said all that, I would be OK with one possible move:  Move the A's to Sacramento. It's close enough that they could keep their Northern California fanbase. The Giants are more popular in every single ZIP Code, but if the A's became "Sacramento's team" instead of "the Bay Area's second team," they'd probably take over in Sacramento and have a more established fanbase. And they'd be close enough for the random Oakland loyalists to still keep up.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.