CA-USC/LA Times: Clinton+8 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 02, 2024, 06:15:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  CA-USC/LA Times: Clinton+8 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CA-USC/LA Times: Clinton+8  (Read 2692 times)
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,736
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52
« on: March 28, 2016, 12:58:29 PM »
Quote from: Shadows on March 28, 2016, 12:24:23 PM
Quote from: A Perez on March 28, 2016, 12:04:51 PM
Clinton's lead is 11% among likely voters.Bloomberg is reporting LV numbers instead of registered voters, as it should be. http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/trackers/2016-03-28/clinton-47-sanders-36-in-california-primary-l-a-times-poll

No break-up, no details, till that is provided that is likely sh**t. CA , Sanders will anyways - I am willing to make a financial bet!

Always a good idea to make bets when there is no active verb to actually bet on. Wink
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,736
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2016, 05:36:12 PM »
Quote from: ElectionsGuy on March 28, 2016, 05:05:46 PM
Why the hell are so many people confident in Sanders here? I don't see a confirming reason to be.

If Bernie loses CA, there is absolutely no chance whatsoever he wins the nomination. Thus, anybody who is a diehard Bernie supporter will say they're confident of victory in CA, because doing otherwise would be to admit defeat.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.