I wish the prosecution hadn’t been arguing for a convicted sex offender, but it seems like it was the right decision. Makes my opinion of Neil Gorsuch go up.
In Sharp v. Murphy, the prosecution argued for a convicted murderer. Kavanaugh and Roberts joined the liberals in a 6-2 ruling.
Why do you say that as if it's some mind-blowing circumstance & not just a consequence of the fact that, though they didn't agree with the decision in
McGirt, they know better than to enable the potential occurrence of a literal same-day Supreme Court jurisprudential split?