Every single one of them is awful. Booker is perhaps the most egregious offender of the bunch, because he's essentially a more honest Obama. He's unabashedly pro-plutocrat and anti-union, while Obama pretends he isn't and tries to make himself out to be something of a progressive. Booker's "progressivism" is the real deal, and is fully devoid of any real content other than a willingness to support the eradication of public education in the name of helping out his buddies at CitiBank.
Worse than the newest, "brightest" face of neoconservatism, whose only accomplishments before getting elected to the Senate were letting a Ponzi scheme happen, pursuing the death penalty for a man solely for the crime of killing while black, and quitting on my state when gay marriage was passed?
I'll let KG say my thoughts on that.
Welcome to the True Left, Victor.
Remember your week long fling with the left?
Well?
Easily, for me, one of the greatest revolutions in the history of mankind. Peacenik liberals may wax lyrical about peace over violence, but the truth is a Reign of Terror against the corrupt bourgeoisie today is far more necessary than in 1789.
Poll
