Should the Convention go on?

[Fritz]

It seems the sentiments I expressed in my "No change!" thread are now shared by the Convention delegates.  I was very recently returned here when I posted that thread, and I did not like what I saw going on here.  My objections were primarily towards the ideas of universalism, and parliamentarianism.  It is now quite clear that neither of these will pass.

The convention should go on, it should accomplish something.  The goals of the convention just need to be changed.  We don't need an entirely new constitution, just some tweaks.