Attn. Justices: Atlasia v. Southeast (Case Closed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 06:34:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Attn. Justices: Atlasia v. Southeast (Case Closed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Attn. Justices: Atlasia v. Southeast (Case Closed)  (Read 4518 times)
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


« on: April 16, 2009, 11:43:47 PM »

Is the peanut gallery allowed comment? I am unaware of court procedure.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2009, 09:27:24 PM »

May I derive from your words that SPC's dixie circulation is fine as long as the SE government does not receive or spend them? So the residents of the SE will have an informal currency once Dollars are removed by their government, but the government does not have that same sort of privilege and would be considered bankrupt.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2009, 10:30:39 PM »

May I derive from your words that SPC's dixie circulation is fine as long as the SE government does not receive or spend them? So the residents of the SE will have an informal currency once Dollars are removed by their government, but the government does not have that same sort of privilege and would be considered bankrupt.

So, it's the best of both worlds. Smiley

In retrospect, it's probably even better than those parts of the FOCA were removed. Too bad it's going to be voted down. Sad

You're bankrupting the region. I guess that's good?

Can the Mideast bailout the region and take 50% ownership stake? There are some states I would like to pick up. Wink

May I derive from your words that SPC's dixie circulation is fine as long as the SE government does not receive or spend them? So the residents of the SE will have an informal currency once Dollars are removed by their government, but the government does not have that same sort of privilege and would be considered bankrupt.

If you could derive that from his words...that would only be one vote of the court.

Wasn't that what the opinion that you joined seemed to imply? If a further clarification will not be provided in this context I would be more than happy to bring up a case.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.