Talk Elections
Forum
Contact
|
US Election Atlas
Election 2020
Election Results
Election Info
Atlas Wiki
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
March 02, 2021, 08:55:47 AM
Talk Elections
Election Archive
Election Archive
2012 Elections
The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
396
397
398
399
400
[
401
]
402
403
404
405
406
...
410
Author
Topic: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread (Read 1059410 times)
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 32,914
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10000 on:
September 17, 2012, 01:06:18 PM »
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Job-Approval-Center.aspx
Approve: 50%, u
Disapprove: 44%, u
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
Posts: 29,395
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10001 on:
September 17, 2012, 01:12:20 PM »
Quote from: J. J. on September 17, 2012, 09:05:55 AM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 07:40:46 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 16, 2012, 07:22:31 PM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 06:34:01 PM
^^lol
Anyway, your election rules already say that Romney has lost, so I don't know why we even need this thread anymore.
The corollary to J. J.'s First Rule is:
Never trust just one poll. Trust several and remember that the electorate changes its mind quickly.
I'm looking at trending.
Oh so the rule doesn't count if the candidate you support says he doesn't look at/trust the polls. Gotcha.
Well, by using the standard you used yesterday, Romney just won.
J. J., your first rule of elections is that if a candidate and his campaign talk about not paying attention to the polls, then that candidate will lose. The Romney campaign released a press release saying not to worry about the latest polls--not one poll, not two specific polls, all of the polls. It then went on detail while polls are not accurate or useful or mean that an election is over.
If Obama had released as statement saying this, what would your response be?
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 9,747
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10002 on:
September 17, 2012, 01:20:56 PM »
Quote from: King on September 17, 2012, 01:12:20 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 17, 2012, 09:05:55 AM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 07:40:46 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 16, 2012, 07:22:31 PM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 06:34:01 PM
^^lol
Anyway, your election rules already say that Romney has lost, so I don't know why we even need this thread anymore.
The corollary to J. J.'s First Rule is:
Never trust just one poll. Trust several and remember that the electorate changes its mind quickly.
I'm looking at trending.
Oh so the rule doesn't count if the candidate you support says he doesn't look at/trust the polls. Gotcha.
Well, by using the standard you used yesterday, Romney just won.
J. J., your first rule of elections is that if a candidate and his campaign talk about not paying attention to the polls, then that candidate will lose. The Romney campaign released a press release saying not to worry about the latest polls--not one poll, not two specific polls, all of the polls. It then went on detail while polls are not accurate or useful or mean that an election is over.
If Obama had released as statement saying this, what would your response be?
Not just the campaign, Mitt Romney himself:
Quote from: a Person on September 16, 2012, 06:30:36 AM
Related:
Quote from: Restricted
You must be
logged in
to read this quote.
Hey J. J.!
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
Posts: 29,395
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10003 on:
September 17, 2012, 01:37:49 PM »
Yeah, that too. I don't understand how J. J. is spinning this. He brought up to Lief "don't look at one poll" as an excuse but that seems like a non sequitur to me.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 32,914
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10004 on:
September 17, 2012, 05:48:43 PM »
Quote from: a Person on September 17, 2012, 01:20:56 PM
Quote from: King on September 17, 2012, 01:12:20 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 17, 2012, 09:05:55 AM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 07:40:46 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 16, 2012, 07:22:31 PM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 06:34:01 PM
^^lol
Anyway, your election rules already say that Romney has lost, so I don't know why we even need this thread anymore.
The corollary to J. J.'s First Rule is:
Never trust just one poll. Trust several and remember that the electorate changes its mind quickly.
I'm looking at trending.
Oh so the rule doesn't count if the candidate you support says he doesn't look at/trust the polls. Gotcha.
Well, by using the standard you used yesterday, Romney just won.
J. J., your first rule of elections is that if a candidate and his campaign talk about not paying attention to the polls, then that candidate will lose. The Romney campaign released a press release saying not to worry about the latest polls--not one poll, not two specific polls, all of the polls. It then went on detail while polls are not accurate or useful or mean that an election is over.
If Obama had released as statement saying this, what would your response be?
Not just the campaign, Mitt Romney himself:
Quote from: a Person on September 16, 2012, 06:30:36 AM
Related:
Quote from: Restricted
You must be
logged in
to read this quote.
Hey J. J.!
Well, first of all, Romney
is
looking at the polls. Secondly, he is noting that they do change over time. It doesn't violate the rule, at all. Sorry if you can't understand that.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 32,914
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10005 on:
September 18, 2012, 08:41:58 AM »
Quote from: J. J. on September 16, 2012, 10:34:33 AM
Rasmussen Obama (National)
Approve 49%, u.
Disapprove 50%, u.
"Strongly Approve" is at 28%, u. "Strongly Disapprove" is at 43%, u.
That is close and unmoving.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 9,747
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10006 on:
September 18, 2012, 08:47:34 AM »
Quote from: J. J. on September 17, 2012, 05:48:43 PM
Quote from: a Person on September 17, 2012, 01:20:56 PM
Quote from: King on September 17, 2012, 01:12:20 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 17, 2012, 09:05:55 AM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 07:40:46 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 16, 2012, 07:22:31 PM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 06:34:01 PM
^^lol
Anyway, your election rules already say that Romney has lost, so I don't know why we even need this thread anymore.
The corollary to J. J.'s First Rule is:
Never trust just one poll. Trust several and remember that the electorate changes its mind quickly.
I'm looking at trending.
Oh so the rule doesn't count if the candidate you support says he doesn't look at/trust the polls. Gotcha.
Well, by using the standard you used yesterday, Romney just won.
J. J., your first rule of elections is that if a candidate and his campaign talk about not paying attention to the polls, then that candidate will lose. The Romney campaign released a press release saying not to worry about the latest polls--not one poll, not two specific polls, all of the polls. It then went on detail while polls are not accurate or useful or mean that an election is over.
If Obama had released as statement saying this, what would your response be?
Not just the campaign, Mitt Romney himself:
Quote from: a Person on September 16, 2012, 06:30:36 AM
Related:
Quote from: Restricted
You must be
logged in
to read this quote.
Hey J. J.!
Well, first of all, Romney
is
looking at the polls. Secondly, he is noting that they do change over time. It doesn't violate the rule, at all. Sorry if you can't understand that.
He's not looking at the polls in Virginia and Ohio -- and whoever wins Virginia and Ohio wins the election.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 32,914
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10007 on:
September 18, 2012, 08:56:08 AM »
Quote from: a Person on September 18, 2012, 08:47:34 AM
Quote from: J. J. on September 17, 2012, 05:48:43 PM
Quote from: a Person on September 17, 2012, 01:20:56 PM
Quote from: King on September 17, 2012, 01:12:20 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 17, 2012, 09:05:55 AM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 07:40:46 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 16, 2012, 07:22:31 PM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 06:34:01 PM
^^lol
Anyway, your election rules already say that Romney has lost, so I don't know why we even need this thread anymore.
The corollary to J. J.'s First Rule is:
Never trust just one poll. Trust several and remember that the electorate changes its mind quickly.
I'm looking at trending.
Oh so the rule doesn't count if the candidate you support says he doesn't look at/trust the polls. Gotcha.
Well, by using the standard you used yesterday, Romney just won.
J. J., your first rule of elections is that if a candidate and his campaign talk about not paying attention to the polls, then that candidate will lose. The Romney campaign released a press release saying not to worry about the latest polls--not one poll, not two specific polls, all of the polls. It then went on detail while polls are not accurate or useful or mean that an election is over.
If Obama had released as statement saying this, what would your response be?
Not just the campaign, Mitt Romney himself:
Quote from: a Person on September 16, 2012, 06:30:36 AM
Related:
Quote from: Restricted
You must be
logged in
to read this quote.
Hey J. J.!
Well, first of all, Romney
is
looking at the polls. Secondly, he is noting that they do change over time. It doesn't violate the rule, at all. Sorry if you can't understand that.
He's not looking at the polls in Virginia and Ohio -- and whoever wins Virginia and Ohio wins the election.
Your statement is wrong on both levels. First the polling in OH and VA is close; both are on my tossup list. Second, I did come up with a few scenarios where Obama wins both, but loses the election.
Here is one:
It is not pretty, but it produces 270 EV's.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 9,747
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10008 on:
September 18, 2012, 09:13:34 AM »
Quote from: J. J. on September 18, 2012, 08:56:08 AM
Quote from: a Person on September 18, 2012, 08:47:34 AM
Quote from: J. J. on September 17, 2012, 05:48:43 PM
Quote from: a Person on September 17, 2012, 01:20:56 PM
Quote from: King on September 17, 2012, 01:12:20 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 17, 2012, 09:05:55 AM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 07:40:46 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 16, 2012, 07:22:31 PM
Quote from: Lief on September 16, 2012, 06:34:01 PM
^^lol
Anyway, your election rules already say that Romney has lost, so I don't know why we even need this thread anymore.
The corollary to J. J.'s First Rule is:
Never trust just one poll. Trust several and remember that the electorate changes its mind quickly.
I'm looking at trending.
Oh so the rule doesn't count if the candidate you support says he doesn't look at/trust the polls. Gotcha.
Well, by using the standard you used yesterday, Romney just won.
J. J., your first rule of elections is that if a candidate and his campaign talk about not paying attention to the polls, then that candidate will lose. The Romney campaign released a press release saying not to worry about the latest polls--not one poll, not two specific polls, all of the polls. It then went on detail while polls are not accurate or useful or mean that an election is over.
If Obama had released as statement saying this, what would your response be?
Not just the campaign, Mitt Romney himself:
Quote from: a Person on September 16, 2012, 06:30:36 AM
Related:
Quote from: Restricted
You must be
logged in
to read this quote.
Hey J. J.!
Well, first of all, Romney
is
looking at the polls. Secondly, he is noting that they do change over time. It doesn't violate the rule, at all. Sorry if you can't understand that.
He's not looking at the polls in Virginia and Ohio -- and whoever wins Virginia and Ohio wins the election.
Your statement is wrong on both levels. First the polling in OH and VA is close; both are on my tossup list. Second, I did come up with a few scenarios where Obama wins both, but loses the election.
Here is one:
It is not pretty, but it produces 270 EV's.
That's not just not a
likely
map, it's not a
possible
map.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
Posts: 41,178
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10009 on:
September 18, 2012, 12:21:33 PM »
Quote from: a Person on September 18, 2012, 09:13:34 AM
Quote from: J. J. on September 18, 2012, 08:56:08 AM
Your statement is wrong on both levels. First the polling in OH and VA is close; both are on my tossup list. Second, I did come up with a few scenarios where Obama wins both, but loses the election.
Here is one:
It is not pretty, but it produces 270 EV's.
That's not just not a
likely
map, it's not a
possible
map.
Yeah, there's no way with the current polling that if Obama gets Ohio and Virginia that he doesn't also get at least one of the other swing states.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 32,914
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10010 on:
September 18, 2012, 12:31:23 PM »
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Job-Approval-Center.aspx
Approve: 49%, -1
Disapprove: 45%, +1
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 32,914
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10011 on:
September 18, 2012, 12:38:46 PM »
Quote from: True Federalist on September 18, 2012, 12:21:33 PM
Quote from: a Person on September 18, 2012, 09:13:34 AM
Quote from: J. J. on September 18, 2012, 08:56:08 AM
Your statement is wrong on both levels. First the polling in OH and VA is close; both are on my tossup list. Second, I did come up with a few scenarios where Obama wins both, but loses the election.
Here is one:
It is not pretty, but it produces 270 EV's.
That's not just not a
likely
map, it's not a
possible
map.
Yeah, there's no way with the current polling that if Obama gets Ohio and Virginia that he doesn't also get at least one of the other swing states.
Today, Obama's lead increased in VA, according to the
WP
. Romney pulled into the lead in CO, according to Rasmussen.
I could
very
easily see something along those lines happening. Note that I didn't put MI in the Romney column, but that remains a possibility. His numbers have improved, even within the same poll, there.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 9,747
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10012 on:
September 18, 2012, 12:51:59 PM »
Quote from: J. J. on September 18, 2012, 12:38:46 PM
Quote from: True Federalist on September 18, 2012, 12:21:33 PM
Quote from: a Person on September 18, 2012, 09:13:34 AM
Quote from: J. J. on September 18, 2012, 08:56:08 AM
Your statement is wrong on both levels. First the polling in OH and VA is close; both are on my tossup list. Second, I did come up with a few scenarios where Obama wins both, but loses the election.
Here is one:
It is not pretty, but it produces 270 EV's.
That's not just not a
likely
map, it's not a
possible
map.
Yeah, there's no way with the current polling that if Obama gets Ohio and Virginia that he doesn't also get at least one of the other swing states.
Today, Obama's lead increased in VA, according to the
WP
. Romney pulled into the lead in CO, according to Rasmussen.
I could
very
easily see something along those lines happening.
Yes. The kind of voters that desert Romney in Virginia and Ohio are
definitely
going to stay with him in Colorado, Iowa, Florida, etc.
Quote from: J. J. on September 18, 2012, 12:38:46 PM
Note that I didn't put MI in the Romney column, but that remains a possibility.
Quote from: J. J. on September 18, 2012, 12:38:46 PM
His numbers have improved, even within the same poll, there.
Which poll are you talking about, specifically?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 32,914
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10013 on:
September 18, 2012, 01:09:48 PM »
Quote from: a Person on September 18, 2012, 12:51:59 PM
Which poll are you talking about, specifically?
PPP. In July, Obama had a 14 point lead; two weeks ago, it was down to 7. Some of the lesser ones, newspapers, local pollsters, are putting it closer. Only EPIC has shown an increase off of a 3 point lead.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 9,747
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10014 on:
September 18, 2012, 01:13:02 PM »
Quote from: J. J. on September 18, 2012, 01:09:48 PM
Quote from: a Person on September 18, 2012, 12:51:59 PM
Which poll are you talking about, specifically?
PPP. In July, Obama had a 14 point lead; two weeks ago, it was down to 7. Some of the lesser ones, newspapers, local pollsters, are putting it closer. Only EPIC has shown an increase off of a 3 point lead.
A 7-point lead doesn't make Michigan a "possibility" for Romney. And considering Michigan-only-pollsters' ludicrous bias, you can't count FMW's latest nonsense.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 32,914
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10015 on:
September 18, 2012, 06:15:59 PM »
Quote from: a Person on September 18, 2012, 01:13:02 PM
Quote from: J. J. on September 18, 2012, 01:09:48 PM
Quote from: a Person on September 18, 2012, 12:51:59 PM
Which poll are you talking about, specifically?
PPP. In July, Obama had a 14 point lead; two weeks ago, it was down to 7. Some of the lesser ones, newspapers, local pollsters, are putting it closer. Only EPIC has shown an increase off of a 3 point lead.
A 7-point lead doesn't make Michigan a "possibility" for Romney. And considering Michigan-only-pollsters' ludicrous bias, you can't count FMW's latest nonsense.
As I indicated, I did not include it.
However, a drop of 7 points in 8 weeks on a slightly Democratic poll is significant. Some of the lesser ones are showing it closer. One of the superpacs just made an $800 K ad buy in MI. On top of that, there does appear to be trending toward Romney in the region, with OH static, and Obama's only strong state being IL. That isn't enough to start calling it a tossup or blue, but it certainly is a light shade of red.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 32,914
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10016 on:
September 19, 2012, 09:08:13 AM »
Rasmussen Obama (National)
Approve 49%, u.
Disapprove 50%, u.
"Strongly Approve" is at 30%, +2. "Strongly Disapprove" is at 42%, -1.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 32,914
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10017 on:
September 19, 2012, 01:18:50 PM »
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Job-Approval-Center.aspx
Approve: 48%, -1
Disapprove: 46%, +1
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
Posts: 57,438
Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10018 on:
September 19, 2012, 01:35:35 PM »
The new Pew poll looks likely to push Obama over the 50% approval barrier at RCP.
Logged
mondale84
Jr. Member
Posts: 1,307
Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10019 on:
September 19, 2012, 02:05:47 PM »
Quote from: Tender Branson on September 19, 2012, 01:35:35 PM
The new Pew poll looks likely to push Obama over the 50% approval barrier at RCP.
It hasn't because they're hacks...
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 9,747
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10020 on:
September 19, 2012, 02:31:56 PM »
Quote from: mondale84 on September 19, 2012, 02:05:47 PM
Quote from: Tender Branson on September 19, 2012, 01:35:35 PM
The new Pew poll looks likely to push Obama over the 50% approval barrier at RCP.
It hasn't because they're hacks...
Or maybe it's because Pew is at best a mediocre pollster.
Logged
mondale84
Jr. Member
Posts: 1,307
Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10021 on:
September 19, 2012, 04:48:04 PM »
Quote from: Resign, Inks! on September 19, 2012, 02:31:56 PM
Quote from: mondale84 on September 19, 2012, 02:05:47 PM
Quote from: Tender Branson on September 19, 2012, 01:35:35 PM
The new Pew poll looks likely to push Obama over the 50% approval barrier at RCP.
It hasn't because they're hacks...
Or maybe it's because Pew is at best a mediocre pollster.
That doesn't change the fact that RCP is a hack website...
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 32,914
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10022 on:
September 19, 2012, 04:49:14 PM »
Quote from: mondale84 on September 19, 2012, 04:48:04 PM
Quote from: Resign, Inks! on September 19, 2012, 02:31:56 PM
Quote from: mondale84 on September 19, 2012, 02:05:47 PM
Quote from: Tender Branson on September 19, 2012, 01:35:35 PM
The new Pew poll looks likely to push Obama over the 50% approval barrier at RCP.
It hasn't because they're hacks...
Or maybe it's because Pew is at best a mediocre pollster.
That doesn't change the fact that RCP is a hack website...
RCP is fine, but a number of these polls are garbage.
Logged
mondale84
Jr. Member
Posts: 1,307
Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10023 on:
September 19, 2012, 05:10:07 PM »
Quote from: J. J. on September 19, 2012, 04:49:14 PM
Quote from: mondale84 on September 19, 2012, 04:48:04 PM
Quote from: Resign, Inks! on September 19, 2012, 02:31:56 PM
Quote from: mondale84 on September 19, 2012, 02:05:47 PM
Quote from: Tender Branson on September 19, 2012, 01:35:35 PM
The new Pew poll looks likely to push Obama over the 50% approval barrier at RCP.
It hasn't because they're hacks...
Or maybe it's because Pew is at best a mediocre pollster.
That doesn't change the fact that RCP is a hack website...
RCP is fine, but a number of these polls are garbage.
I agree that a number of these polls are garbage including all Rassy, Gallup and ARG trolljobs, but RCP is a right-wing hack website and you should look at their article headlines to get a better idea of where they stand...
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 8,394
Political Matrix
E: -4.00, S: -4.00
Re: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread
«
Reply #10024 on:
September 19, 2012, 06:29:44 PM »
^Much like looking at your thread titles...?
Logged
Pages:
1
...
396
397
398
399
400
[
401
]
402
403
404
405
406
...
410
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2024 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Polling
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/State Elections
===> 2022 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2021 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2022 Senate & House Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
About this Site
-----------------------------
===> How To
=> The Atlas
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> Election Archive
===> 2018 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2018 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2014 House Election Polls
=====> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 Elections
=====> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2012 House Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Elections
=====> 2010 House Election Polls
=====> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Elections
=====> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2006 Elections
=====> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> 2020 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2020 Senate & House Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliament
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Terms of Service
-
DMCA Agent and Policy
-
Privacy Policy and Cookies
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.088 seconds with 15 queries.
Loading...