Mideast Constitutional Convention
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 12:21:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Mideast Constitutional Convention
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10
Author Topic: Mideast Constitutional Convention  (Read 13437 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #175 on: February 15, 2009, 06:09:23 PM »

60 hours is good, I guess.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #176 on: February 15, 2009, 07:08:14 PM »

I bring the following for a vote:



Amendment 6a

Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 which currently reads: "In order to be nominated to the Superior Court, a person shall be nominated by the Governor or Speaker of the Assembly."
shall hereby be amended to read: "In order to be nominated to the Superior Court, a person shall be nominated by the Governor of the Mideast. In the event that 60 hours elapse from the time of a case being filed in the Mideast Superior Court without such action taken by the Governor, said responsibility shall fall exclusively to the Speaker of the Assembly."

Article II, Section 2 shall hereby include the following as Clause 3, with all other clauses numbered accordingly:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.



The vote will last for 24 hours. Please indicate aye, nay, or abstain.



Aye
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #177 on: February 15, 2009, 07:23:50 PM »

I was thinking of one other thing just now - what if people simply recall the judge because they disagree with how he ruled a case?
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,002


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #178 on: February 15, 2009, 07:27:36 PM »

I was thinking of one other thing just now - what if people simply recall the judge because they disagree with how he ruled a case?

That is a possibility. Therefore I have an issue with the second part of the amendment. After some thought on the issue of SCJ, we may have to revert to the current set-up if no other system can work well and without political intervention.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #179 on: February 15, 2009, 07:42:00 PM »

I was thinking of one other thing just now - what if people simply recall the judge because they disagree with how he ruled a case?

That is a possibility. Therefore I have an issue with the second part of the amendment. After some thought on the issue of SCJ, we may have to revert to the current set-up if no other system can work well and without political intervention.

I'll probably at least try to do that if the third constitution passes.  I think we'll get more input if I put the amendment on a monthly ballot.  So if people say keep it temporary, I'm fine with that, because at least we had more input.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #180 on: February 15, 2009, 09:39:30 PM »

The recall would require a large movement in the region though. In order to have that kind of movement would likely require an actual abuse of the office.

Couldn't the same action currently be taken before a verdict is given? I just want to ensure that no rush jobs are done in which an abuse of power is allowed to serve as the law.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #181 on: February 16, 2009, 10:28:39 AM »

Election for Presiding Officer:

[ ] Purple State
[ ] Write-in:

Please choose one



Is anyone going to vote on the amendment? There are about 9 hours remaining in the vote.

Amendment 6a

Aye
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #182 on: February 16, 2009, 10:31:12 AM »

Election for Presiding Officer:

[ 1] Purple State
[ ] Write-in:





Amendment 6a

Nay
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #183 on: February 16, 2009, 01:11:23 PM »

Amendment 6a
AYE
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #184 on: February 16, 2009, 01:11:50 PM »

Election for Presiding Officer:

[ X] Purple State
[ ] Write-in:
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #185 on: February 16, 2009, 08:26:59 PM »

I will be extending the vote on Amendment 6a for another 24 hours so that a quorum can be met.

We also still have just under 24 hours left in the election for presiding officer and need a quorum for that as well.

Let's go people. Almost there!
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,002


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #186 on: February 16, 2009, 08:29:47 PM »

Can't believe I missed this Tongue

Election for Presiding Officer:

[ 1] Purple State
[ ] Write-in:


Amendment 6a

Aye
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,432
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #187 on: February 16, 2009, 08:49:31 PM »

  • Purple State

6a

NAY
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #188 on: February 16, 2009, 09:56:14 PM »

Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #189 on: February 16, 2009, 11:34:09 PM »

Article I, Section 1's title need to remove the reference to Lt. Governor.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #190 on: February 17, 2009, 12:04:32 AM »

Article I, Section 1's title need to remove the reference to Lt. Governor.

You do know what word flew to my mouth just there. I hope you know what you have caused.



Amendment [last amendment# + 1]

The title of Article I, Section 1, which reads "Section 1: The Governor and Lieutenant Governor"
shall hereby be renamed "Section 1: The Governor."

Please vote aye, nay, or abstain on the amendment. It shall be open for a period of 24 hours.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #191 on: February 17, 2009, 12:35:53 AM »

Amendment [last amendment# + 1]
AYE

Sorry - but I figured we should try to have a constitution that's as correct as possible.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,432
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #192 on: February 17, 2009, 07:45:43 AM »

aye
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #193 on: February 17, 2009, 07:49:48 AM »

aye
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #194 on: February 17, 2009, 09:47:22 AM »

Aye



Numbers:

Amendment 6a
Aye = 3
Nay = 3
Abstain = 0

Presiding Officer
Purple State = 6

Amendment [whatever]
Aye = 4
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #195 on: February 17, 2009, 12:17:58 PM »

Aye
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #196 on: February 18, 2009, 11:19:06 PM »

Results:

I will assume the chair for presiding officer once again. Amendment [whatever] passes by unanimous consent. Amendment 6a ties and will therefore be further debated.



I bring the following Amendment forward for debate. Please explain your intent of vote and why, as well as any edits you propose.

Amendment 6a

Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 which currently reads: "In order to be nominated to the Superior Court, a person shall be nominated by the Governor or Speaker of the Assembly."
shall hereby be amended to read: "In order to be nominated to the Superior Court, a person shall be nominated by the Governor of the Mideast. In the event that 60 hours elapse from the time of a case being filed in the Mideast Superior Court without such action taken by the Governor, said responsibility shall fall exclusively to the Speaker of the Assembly."

Article II, Section 2 shall hereby include the following as Clause 3, with all other clauses numbered accordingly:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #197 on: February 19, 2009, 03:05:26 AM »
« Edited: February 19, 2009, 03:08:35 AM by Governor, Fmr. Chairman, Fmr. Judge, & Queen Mum Inks.LWC »

If you can get this done in 9 hours, it can be put on the ballot for February.

EDIT: Actually, I normally open ballots at noon, but I'll push it off until 0001 on Friday if it means that we can get the 3C on the ballot; however, I legally cannot push off opening the voting booth any later than that.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #198 on: February 19, 2009, 05:30:20 AM »

I can not support the recall thing with judges...as it just pretty much eliminates the independent judiciary as it would be subject to the public will. That's one thing that definitely doesn't need to be democratized.

Otherwise I have no problem with the amendment.
Logged
Purple State
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,713
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #199 on: February 19, 2009, 09:38:15 AM »

I can not support the recall thing with judges...as it just pretty much eliminates the independent judiciary as it would be subject to the public will. That's one thing that definitely doesn't need to be democratized.

Otherwise I have no problem with the amendment.

If I up the recall of the justice to 2/3 vote, would that get your vote? There just needs to be a check on the justice if he will be chosen by an elected official.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 11 queries.