President Forever results thread...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 02:57:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Election and History Games (Moderator: Dereich)
  President Forever results thread...
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 ... 130
Author Topic: President Forever results thread...  (Read 879382 times)
defe07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 961


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1350 on: September 17, 2008, 09:42:26 PM »

Fred Thompson/Condelezza Rice-330
Joe Biden/Russ Feingold-208(ME)




OK, weird?! You lost Delaware and Wisconsin and somehow beat Thompson in Tennessee?
Logged
defe07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 961


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1351 on: September 17, 2008, 09:47:22 PM »



Polnut/Sebellius - 307EV - 50.7%
McCain/Palin - 231EV - 47.3%
Others -  2%%

I ended losing VT! but won FL, IN, OH!!!


     How on earth did you lose Maryland?
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1352 on: September 18, 2008, 08:49:11 AM »

Fred Thompson/Condelezza Rice-330
Joe Biden/Russ Feingold-208(ME)




OK, weird?! You lost Delaware and Wisconsin and somehow beat Thompson in Tennessee?

Yea plus Texas
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,135
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1353 on: September 18, 2008, 10:12:20 PM »

     I got PF+P back on the computer. After playing it & remembering that it is unplayably glitchy, I did 1896 as McKinley in the old version. It was really easy to hammer Bryan on the Gold Standard, which helped a lot.



Mckinley/Hobart, 54%, 354 EVs
Bryan/Sewall, 39%, 93 EVs
Palmer/Buckner, 3%, 0 EVs
Levering/Johnson, 2%, 0 EVs
Logged
defe07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 961


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1354 on: September 18, 2008, 11:01:35 PM »



Polnut/Sebellius - 307EV - 50.7%
McCain/Palin - 231EV - 47.3%
Others -  2%%

I ended losing VT! but won FL, IN, OH!!!


     You lost MD? How?
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,401
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1355 on: September 19, 2008, 06:55:57 AM »

     I got PF+P back on the computer. After playing it & remembering that it is unplayably glitchy, I did 1896 as McKinley in the old version. It was really easy to hammer Bryan on the Gold Standard, which helped a lot.



Mckinley/Hobart, 54%, 354 EVs
Bryan/Sewall, 39%, 93 EVs
Palmer/Buckner, 3%, 0 EVs
Levering/Johnson, 2%, 0 EVs


How do you get old scenarios for PF+P? I don't see them on their downloads page.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1356 on: September 19, 2008, 11:50:30 AM »

The Democratic Primary - well it was interesting - firstly Biden won Iowa and Dodd won NH.

But they didn't last long. While I got a close - I didn't win anything until ST, but when it came down to me v Clinton v Obama  I started to surge.

Ironically what did me in.... Obama endorsed Clinton.



Delegates
Clinton - 2221
Me - 1615

I became her running-mate.

Well the GE was.... interesting. We clobbered Giuliani on his experience.

I definited closed in on him but we didn't quite expect this - I think my 50-state leadership ad 3 days out made a BIG difference.



Clinton/Polnut - 534 EV 74,310,066 - 58.5%
Giuliani/Owens - 4EV 52,644,232 - 41.5%

....wow.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,135
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1357 on: September 19, 2008, 04:41:59 PM »

     I got PF+P back on the computer. After playing it & remembering that it is unplayably glitchy, I did 1896 as McKinley in the old version. It was really easy to hammer Bryan on the Gold Standard, which helped a lot.



Mckinley/Hobart, 54%, 354 EVs
Bryan/Sewall, 39%, 93 EVs
Palmer/Buckner, 3%, 0 EVs
Levering/Johnson, 2%, 0 EVs


How do you get old scenarios for PF+P? I don't see them on their downloads page.

     Old scenarios are available here.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1358 on: September 19, 2008, 04:58:12 PM »

I hit the spacebar button until 3 days left in the campaign, when I ran 4 negative ads against McKinley in every state I was trailing in.

Bryan: 70% PV, 447 EV
McKinley: 30% PV, 0 EV

Closest state was Delaware, decided by 1,683 votes.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,401
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1359 on: September 19, 2008, 05:21:27 PM »

     I got PF+P back on the computer. After playing it & remembering that it is unplayably glitchy, I did 1896 as McKinley in the old version. It was really easy to hammer Bryan on the Gold Standard, which helped a lot.



Mckinley/Hobart, 54%, 354 EVs
Bryan/Sewall, 39%, 93 EVs
Palmer/Buckner, 3%, 0 EVs
Levering/Johnson, 2%, 0 EVs


How do you get old scenarios for PF+P? I don't see them on their downloads page.

     Old scenarios are available here.

I tried does on PF+P, but they don't work. They're PF scenarios only IIRC.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,135
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1360 on: September 19, 2008, 05:27:43 PM »

     I got PF+P back on the computer. After playing it & remembering that it is unplayably glitchy, I did 1896 as McKinley in the old version. It was really easy to hammer Bryan on the Gold Standard, which helped a lot.



Mckinley/Hobart, 54%, 354 EVs
Bryan/Sewall, 39%, 93 EVs
Palmer/Buckner, 3%, 0 EVs
Levering/Johnson, 2%, 0 EVs


How do you get old scenarios for PF+P? I don't see them on their downloads page.

     Old scenarios are available here.

I tried does on PF+P, but they don't work. They're PF scenarios only IIRC.

     Naturally. I find it impossible to play PF+P. The game is much, much too glitchy. What happened was I was playing in 2004 as Bush. I had no primary opponent, so I just ran ads promoting myself, & slowly overtook all of the states. Eventually, Nader entered the lead in IL & WV, Badnarik in NJ, & Peroutka in PA. Strange enough yet? Well, I entered the lead in DC at this point, so the Democrat had no EVs. All of a sudden, Edwards got almost 90% in the NC primary, & the generic Democrat jumped into the lead in general election polls there. So I offered all of my PIPs to Edwards to get him to drop out & endorse me. After that happened, the game crashed due to momentum overflow. This was mid-March in the campaign, so I lost a lot of time spent on that scenario. Angry
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,401
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1361 on: September 19, 2008, 05:28:52 PM »

I only have PF+P, sadly.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,135
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1362 on: September 20, 2008, 05:54:29 PM »

     I reloaded from an earlier save & played PF+P through to the end. It's really a joke if you have no primary opponent.



Bush/Cheney, 81.5%, 538 EVs
Kerry/Biden, 14.1%, 0 EVs
Nader/Camejo, 1.5%, 0 EVs
Badnarik/Brown, 1.4%, 0 EVs
Peroutka/Baldwin, 1.4% 0 EVs
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,135
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1363 on: September 21, 2008, 03:44:14 PM »

     I guess no one wants to comment on my overwhelming margin of victory. Smiley
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1364 on: September 21, 2008, 04:07:15 PM »

I've got one better than PiT's:

Powell/Lieberman: 84.4% PV, 538 EV
Edwards/Graham: 10.9% PV, 0 EV
Nader/Camejo: 2.5% PV, 0 EV
Badnarik/Brown: 1.8% PV, 0 EV
Peroutka/Baldwin: 0.4% PV, 0 EV
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,401
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1365 on: September 21, 2008, 04:10:07 PM »

French scenario:

Republican primaries as Goulard



Goulard in green, Dupont-Aignan in blue, and Alliot-Marie in red.





Goulard/Fillon (R): 41,060,290 (34.8%) 195EV
Bayrou/de Sarnez (IC): 36,369,300 (30.8%) 246EV
Royal/Fabius (D): 35,736,623 (30.3%) 97EV
Le Pen/Le Pen (Con): 4,899,555 (4.1%) 0EV

Wow. The House elected Royal.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1366 on: September 21, 2008, 05:23:50 PM »

Le Pen/Le Pen?
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,401
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1367 on: September 21, 2008, 06:04:57 PM »


His daughter.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,135
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1368 on: September 21, 2008, 09:52:08 PM »

     Ran in 1916 as Hughes. Not a whole lot to say, though both third-party candidates started out with ~15% in WY for some reason. I also lost MN, despite Hughes winning it in real life.



Hughes/Butler, 50%, 387 EVs
Wilson/Marshall, 43%, 144 EVs
Benson/Kirkpatrick, 4%, 0 EVs
Hanly/Seidel, 1%, 0 EVs
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1369 on: September 22, 2008, 09:54:46 AM »



Biden/Gore:196
Bush/Haig:342

I was doing excellent until the last week when I got hit with a level 9 scandal.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1370 on: September 23, 2008, 02:57:59 AM »

2006 Presidential Election



Don Butler/Jeff Haffley (R): 249 EV, 35% of the PV (44,585,206)
Seth Gillette/Jim Jerich (I): 179 EV, 31% of the PV (38,579,869)
Ricky Rafferty/Andrea Wyatt (D): 99 EV, 32% of the PV (40,781,233)

In the 2006 West Wing scenario I ran as North Dakota Senator Seth Gillette, a liberal third party candidate. My opponents were the extremely conservative Reverend Don Butler of Virginia and the extremely liberal Senator Ricky Rafferty of Vermont. The 2006 Presidential Election similar to my past games played both in President and Prime Minister Forever was a rollercoster of an election. For the most part of the election Reverend Butler led for most of the campaign, until a series of negative advertisements released by the Gillette campaign propelled Senator Rafferty into the lead. Yet Senator Rafferty's lead disappeared when I did the same to her campaign, by releasing a series of negative advertisements in crucial Democratic states I was targetting. By Election Day, polls indicated that Butler had a narrow lead over Rafferty 37 percent to 33 percent, with Gillette coming in a distant third with 27 percent. By Election Night I had managed to receive more than 38 million votes and 179 Electoral College votes, and in the process caused the election to head to the House. As the Republicans controlled the House, the extremely conservative Reverend Don Butler succeeded Josiah Bartlet in the White House.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,401
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1371 on: September 23, 2008, 07:55:42 PM »



Sarkozy/Fillon (R): 82,257,402 (70.1%) 535EVs
Royal/Montebourg (D): 35,103,021 (29.9%) 3EVs

OK, I knew I was going to win big (up about 43-30 before Election Day), but never this huge of a margin. Royal had a large lead in MA, VT, RI, and we were tied in NY, CA, and other smaller states.

Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,401
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1372 on: September 23, 2008, 08:09:12 PM »

Played on sidelines to see the result of a FDR vs. Lincoln vs. Washington vs. Jefferson vs. Tyler battle.



Lincoln/Nixon (R): 41,656,645 (25.8%) 242EVs
Roosevelt/Johnson (D): 41,305,691 (25.6%) 240EVs
Washington/Adams (F): 39,806,564 (24.6%) 56EVs
Jefferson/Calhoun (DR): 19,474,615 (12%) 0EVs
Tyler/Harrison (W): 19,387,387 (12%) 0EVs

lol
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1373 on: September 24, 2008, 03:15:25 PM »

House?
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,401
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1374 on: September 24, 2008, 04:48:53 PM »


FDR
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 ... 130  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.103 seconds with 12 queries.