If the Presidential Election used Instant Runoff Voting in past elections? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 02:03:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  If the Presidential Election used Instant Runoff Voting in past elections? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If the Presidential Election used Instant Runoff Voting in past elections?  (Read 2907 times)
defe07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 961


« on: December 15, 2008, 03:54:10 PM »

What would happen if each state used Instant Runoff Voting in past elections? You know, a candidate has to win an absolute majority to get the Electoral Votes in a state. Anybody care to what-if here?
Logged
defe07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 961


« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2008, 01:42:55 PM »

I wonder how 1912 would be played out. Anybody?
Logged
defe07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 961


« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2009, 01:01:01 PM »

Here's what I get for '92 if we allow Bush to win states with a difference of 4 points or less
Why do you do that?

Simplicity, mostly.  I agree that most of Perot's votes were anti-Bush votes, but I think a certain number of them were basically conservative votes that were not inclined to go for Clinton.  So, I just allowed states that fell within the MoE to break for Bush, and gave the states outside the MoE to Clinton.  Of course, it's entirely possible, given the results in '96, that Ohio (particularly since Glenn won his Senate seat that year), Louisianna, Kentucky and Tennessee would have gone for Clinton anyway in '92, though I don't think Georgia or Montana would have.  In this case the map would look like this:

Clinton 342
Bush 196






But you forget that in Maine and Utah, Perot came in 2nd. Since IRV works by eliminating the candidates with the least number of votes in each round if no candidate gets an absolute majority, you don't think Maine and/or Utah could swing to Perot in the final round? Plus, New Jersey could've been a close win for Bush because he barely lost it by a point or so.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.