Alabama proposes "fat tax."
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 10, 2025, 09:52:34 AM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Abolish ICE, Tokugawa Sexgod Ieyasu, Utilitarian Governance)
  Alabama proposes "fat tax."
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Alabama proposes "fat tax."  (Read 921 times)
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 02, 2008, 01:33:31 PM »

I'm kind of suprised that this is coming from a Southern state. Opinions?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,255
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2008, 01:35:22 PM »

I'm kind of suprised that this is coming from a Southern state. Opinions?

I'm not. The south is where the most money is to be made by such a tax Smiley
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2008, 01:54:22 PM »

Apologies for neglecting to provide the link:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,414861,00.html
Logged
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,856
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2008, 04:26:05 PM »

Damn nanny staters.  ;-)
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 48,813
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2008, 05:00:55 PM »

This makes sense.  Smokers have to pay more for life insurance, fatties shouldn't be shocked when they have pay more for health insurance.


(and yes, I know, .05% of fat people can't help it.  The other 99.95% can though.)
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2008, 05:37:51 PM »

OK, at first I thought this was a tax for general people and I thought, why is dead0man for this, but then I went over to read the article (I had been waiting for it to load while I read comments), and I gotta say, I kinda agree with him, but on the other hand, I kinda don't.

I'd be more comfortable with letting a private company do this than the government though.  But if it's costing the government too much money to keep insuring them, I guess they could say to the employees, "Look, you have 3 options: 1) Sign on to this plan; 2) Find your own insurrance; 3) Quit"
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,630
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2008, 05:58:55 PM »

OK, at first I thought this was a tax for general people and I thought, why is dead0man for this, but then I went over to read the article (I had been waiting for it to load while I read comments), and I gotta say, I kinda agree with him, but on the other hand, I kinda don't.

I'd be more comfortable with letting a private company do this than the government though.  But if it's costing the government too much money to keep insuring them, I guess they could say to the employees, "Look, you have 3 options: 1) Sign on to this plan; 2) Find your own insurrance; 3) Quit"

It appears the private companies have already done this.  It is likely that if they had their own insurance, they'd pay a higher premium, but that they probably pay the same price under their benefits plan with the government... so now rather than the government just eating that cost, they're simply passing it on.

I understand it, but I don't agree with it.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2008, 07:12:47 PM »

This is just a tax on teh poor who can't afford personal trainers.

Do they tax by the pound or inches around the waste or body fat % or what?
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 48,813
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 02, 2008, 07:42:05 PM »
« Edited: September 02, 2008, 07:46:35 PM by dead0man »

This is just a tax on teh poor who can't afford personal trainers.

Do they tax by the pound or inches around the waste or body fat % or what?
The article said BMI, which has it's faults.

I'd like to make it clear that I don't support this (nor am I against it), I just understand.  This is Alabama's issue.

edit=and it's not a "tax on the poor".  It's a tax on the fat if it's a tax on anything.  Being poor doesn't make you fat and yes I understand that's it's easier to be fat if you're poor because low cost food is horrible for you (at least the kind of low fat food poor Americans tend to buy).  But that still doesn't mean being poor makes you fat.  And these are employee's of the state we're talking about here anyway, they generally aren't going to be poor.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 9 queries.