How the hell did Bill Clinton win Kentucky twice?
He was a white Southern good ole' boy who ran as a moderate Democrat with quiet times.
Isn't it sad that people really care about that?
The only two Democrats elected in the last 30 years were two Southern Governors who ran as moderates.
So? Isn't it still pathetic that you have to be a good ole boy to win as a Democrat in Kentucky? Doesn't that say quite a bit about the voters there?
I don't understand your point?
My point is that I think it could be quite possible that a politician with exactly the same politics from....let's say, California or New York...wouldn't have won Kentucky.
So I'm saying it's pretty embarrassing that that matters so much to Kentucky voters.