Why do dems pick more electable veeps than candidates? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:51:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why do dems pick more electable veeps than candidates? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why do dems pick more electable veeps than candidates?  (Read 1397 times)
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


« on: July 08, 2008, 09:30:06 AM »
« edited: July 08, 2008, 09:42:06 AM by Blue Dog »

You forgot Loyd Bentson.

I think it has to do our primary system. We tend to have a firebrand/maverick politician show up who shocks everyone by winning  (Hart, Dean, Bradley). This person normally fizzles out. Normally this has to do with them either alienating old party interests (like Labor Unions) and/or being perceived as too liberal. As a result the final candidate tends to be sort of generic and doesn't really please anyone (Mondale, Dukakis, Gore, Kerry). The only exception to this theory is really Obama, but he won mainly because we cast out a couple states plus Edwards split the vote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.