NJ Democratic Senate Primary - General Discussion
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 12:29:01 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NJ Democratic Senate Primary - General Discussion
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
Author Topic: NJ Democratic Senate Primary - General Discussion  (Read 15135 times)
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: May 31, 2008, 10:16:32 AM »

My final prediction going into the primary:

Republicans
State Sen. Joe Pennachio 46%
Fmr. Rep. Dick Zimmer 43%
Dr. Murray Sabrin 11%

Democrats
Rep. Bob Andrews 48%
Sen. Frank Lautenberg 47%
Mayor Donald Cresitello 5%
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: May 31, 2008, 10:37:56 AM »

I find it really amusing that you actually think Andrews will win. Then again, maybe it shouldn't be surprising; we see projections of desires from you all the time.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: May 31, 2008, 11:48:49 AM »

Did anyone see the debate last night? It was quite good. Lautenberg spoke well for the most part until near the end when he started this Ted Kennedy-esque boston "uh's"

He also tried to have Andrews acknowledge he wouldn't run for his house seat "after he loses the senate race." That was pretty funny.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: May 31, 2008, 12:07:28 PM »

I find it really amusing that you actually think Andrews will win. Then again, maybe it shouldn't be surprising; we see projections of desires from you all the time.
I never denied I make predictions based on desires often, but there is really no polling out for this race other than those that suggest Lautenberg has low approvals.  If Andrews can make a dent in Bergen and/or Hudson, he has more than a 50/50 shot
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: May 31, 2008, 12:13:35 PM »

I find it really amusing that you actually think Andrews will win. Then again, maybe it shouldn't be surprising; we see projections of desires from you all the time.
I never denied I make predictions based on desires often, but there is really no polling out for this race other than those that suggest Lautenberg has low approvals.  If Andrews can make a dent in Bergen and/or Hudson, he has more than a 50/50 shot

There were a few polls showing Lautenberg around 40-45% and Andrews around 15-20% (and Cresitello around 5-10%). Anyway, local evidence suggests Andrews is going to get beaten to a pulp here; there are no Andrews signs but tons of Lautenberg signs (usually in tandem with various other local officials being challenged in the primaries). Actually, that last could hurt Lautenberg as he's heavily tied his horse to the Ferriero candidates in Bergen County, but I think it's somewhat unlikely.

It'll be interesting to see which column Andrews is on in the sample ballots. Column 3 would definitely be a big boost...
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: May 31, 2008, 12:17:19 PM »

I find it really amusing that you actually think Andrews will win. Then again, maybe it shouldn't be surprising; we see projections of desires from you all the time.
I never denied I make predictions based on desires often, but there is really no polling out for this race other than those that suggest Lautenberg has low approvals.  If Andrews can make a dent in Bergen and/or Hudson, he has more than a 50/50 shot

There were a few polls showing Lautenberg around 40-45% and Andrews around 15-20% (and Cresitello around 5-10%). Anyway, local evidence suggests Andrews is going to get beaten to a pulp here; there are no Andrews signs but tons of Lautenberg signs (usually in tandem with various other local officials being challenged in the primaries). Actually, that last could hurt Lautenberg as he's heavily tied his horse to the Ferriero candidates in Bergen County, but I think it's somewhat unlikely.

It'll be interesting to see which column Andrews is on in the sample ballots. Column 3 would definitely be a big boost...
I received the sample ballot, he's listed by his lonesome in Column 1
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: May 31, 2008, 12:24:22 PM »

I find it really amusing that you actually think Andrews will win. Then again, maybe it shouldn't be surprising; we see projections of desires from you all the time.
I never denied I make predictions based on desires often, but there is really no polling out for this race other than those that suggest Lautenberg has low approvals.  If Andrews can make a dent in Bergen and/or Hudson, he has more than a 50/50 shot

There were a few polls showing Lautenberg around 40-45% and Andrews around 15-20% (and Cresitello around 5-10%). Anyway, local evidence suggests Andrews is going to get beaten to a pulp here; there are no Andrews signs but tons of Lautenberg signs (usually in tandem with various other local officials being challenged in the primaries). Actually, that last could hurt Lautenberg as he's heavily tied his horse to the Ferriero candidates in Bergen County, but I think it's somewhat unlikely.

It'll be interesting to see which column Andrews is on in the sample ballots. Column 3 would definitely be a big boost...
I received the sample ballot, he's listed by his lonesome in Column 1

Did it come today? I hadn't seen them yet.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: May 31, 2008, 12:26:19 PM »

I find it really amusing that you actually think Andrews will win. Then again, maybe it shouldn't be surprising; we see projections of desires from you all the time.
I never denied I make predictions based on desires often, but there is really no polling out for this race other than those that suggest Lautenberg has low approvals.  If Andrews can make a dent in Bergen and/or Hudson, he has more than a 50/50 shot

There were a few polls showing Lautenberg around 40-45% and Andrews around 15-20% (and Cresitello around 5-10%). Anyway, local evidence suggests Andrews is going to get beaten to a pulp here; there are no Andrews signs but tons of Lautenberg signs (usually in tandem with various other local officials being challenged in the primaries). Actually, that last could hurt Lautenberg as he's heavily tied his horse to the Ferriero candidates in Bergen County, but I think it's somewhat unlikely.

It'll be interesting to see which column Andrews is on in the sample ballots. Column 3 would definitely be a big boost...
I received the sample ballot, he's listed by his lonesome in Column 1

Did it come today? I hadn't seen them yet.
Mine (or my specifically my parents) came in the mail yesterday
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: May 31, 2008, 12:54:58 PM »

I find it really amusing that you actually think Andrews will win. Then again, maybe it shouldn't be surprising; we see projections of desires from you all the time.
I never denied I make predictions based on desires often, but there is really no polling out for this race other than those that suggest Lautenberg has low approvals.  If Andrews can make a dent in Bergen and/or Hudson, he has more than a 50/50 shot

There were a few polls showing Lautenberg around 40-45% and Andrews around 15-20% (and Cresitello around 5-10%). Anyway, local evidence suggests Andrews is going to get beaten to a pulp here; there are no Andrews signs but tons of Lautenberg signs (usually in tandem with various other local officials being challenged in the primaries). Actually, that last could hurt Lautenberg as he's heavily tied his horse to the Ferriero candidates in Bergen County, but I think it's somewhat unlikely.

It'll be interesting to see which column Andrews is on in the sample ballots. Column 3 would definitely be a big boost...
I received the sample ballot, he's listed by his lonesome in Column 1

Did it come today? I hadn't seen them yet.
Mine (or my specifically my parents) came in the mail yesterday

...And the mail just came with mine today.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: May 31, 2008, 02:58:27 PM »

Andrews is in the number one spot where I live.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: June 01, 2008, 08:45:05 AM »

Andrews is in the number one spot where I live.
County lines, your in Sussex right?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: June 01, 2008, 08:50:18 AM »

Did anyone see the debate last night? It was quite good. Lautenberg spoke well for the most part until near the end when he started this Ted Kennedy-esque boston "uh's"

I saw a bit of it but I was kind of out of it (after surgery). Lautenberg is an absolutely horrific speaker. The "uh's" didn't come towards the end either. They were present throughout. I'm about to watch the GOP debate and then the Andrews vs. "the other guy" debate on ABC. I have a feeling the GOP debate will be amusing.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

That's one of my problems with Andrews. His wife was on one of the local news broadcasts last night, saying she would not step aside for him. Sure.
Logged
Conan
conan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: June 01, 2008, 11:24:19 AM »

Did anyone see the debate last night? It was quite good. Lautenberg spoke well for the most part until near the end when he started this Ted Kennedy-esque boston "uh's"

I saw a bit of it but I was kind of out of it (after surgery). Lautenberg is an absolutely horrific speaker. The "uh's" didn't come towards the end either. They were present throughout. I'm about to watch the GOP debate and then the Andrews vs. "the other guy" debate on ABC. I have a feeling the GOP debate will be amusing.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

That's one of my problems with Andrews. His wife was on one of the local news broadcasts last night, saying she would not step aside for him. Sure.
I only caught the second half of the debate.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: June 01, 2008, 11:58:58 AM »

I find it really amusing that you actually think Andrews will win. Then again, maybe it shouldn't be surprising; we see projections of desires from you all the time.
I never denied I make predictions based on desires often, but there is really no polling out for this race other than those that suggest Lautenberg has low approvals.  If Andrews can make a dent in Bergen and/or Hudson, he has more than a 50/50 shot

There were a few polls showing Lautenberg around 40-45% and Andrews around 15-20% (and Cresitello around 5-10%). Anyway, local evidence suggests Andrews is going to get beaten to a pulp here; there are no Andrews signs but tons of Lautenberg signs (usually in tandem with various other local officials being challenged in the primaries). Actually, that last could hurt Lautenberg as he's heavily tied his horse to the Ferriero candidates in Bergen County, but I think it's somewhat unlikely.

It'll be interesting to see which column Andrews is on in the sample ballots. Column 3 would definitely be a big boost...

One of the problems for Lautenberg in Bergen is that, while he may be heavily behind the Ferriero slate, Ferriero is lukewarm about Lautenberg himself, only backing him out of fear of Rothman.

Will Ferriero really want to put the machine to work for Lautenberg?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: June 01, 2008, 03:05:26 PM »

That Republican debate was just awful. I think it was the worst debate I've ever watched. The candidates are some of the worst I've ever seen as well.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: June 02, 2008, 07:16:28 PM »

That Republican debate was just awful. I think it was the worst debate I've ever watched. The candidates are some of the worst I've ever seen as well.
Sabrin was the only who could string together a coherent sentence.  Pennachio talks like Elmer Fudd and can't decide whether to leave his glasses on or off, and Zimmer blinks more than John Edwards.  I'm thinking this might be the year the GOP has a shot in NJ Tongue
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: June 02, 2008, 07:28:04 PM »

I find it really amusing that you actually think Andrews will win. Then again, maybe it shouldn't be surprising; we see projections of desires from you all the time.
I never denied I make predictions based on desires often, but there is really no polling out for this race other than those that suggest Lautenberg has low approvals.  If Andrews can make a dent in Bergen and/or Hudson, he has more than a 50/50 shot

There were a few polls showing Lautenberg around 40-45% and Andrews around 15-20% (and Cresitello around 5-10%). Anyway, local evidence suggests Andrews is going to get beaten to a pulp here; there are no Andrews signs but tons of Lautenberg signs (usually in tandem with various other local officials being challenged in the primaries). Actually, that last could hurt Lautenberg as he's heavily tied his horse to the Ferriero candidates in Bergen County, but I think it's somewhat unlikely.

It'll be interesting to see which column Andrews is on in the sample ballots. Column 3 would definitely be a big boost...

One of the problems for Lautenberg in Bergen is that, while he may be heavily behind the Ferriero slate, Ferriero is lukewarm about Lautenberg himself, only backing him out of fear of Rothman.

Will Ferriero really want to put the machine to work for Lautenberg?

Apparently he is: I got home tonight to six robocall messages. One from the anti-Ferriero Democrats about the City Council election, one from the pro-Ferriero Democrats about the City Council election and four from the Ferriero Democrats, Rothman and Lautenberg himself about Lautenberg. Nothing about Andrews. (And even the anti-Ferriero Democrats reminded me to vote for Lautenberg in their call.)

Ferriero really just doesn't like Lautenberg because, had Lautenberg resigned, it would gotten him clean of Rothman (who would have run for Senate) and probably allowed Michael Wildes to waltz into Rothman's seat (ugh).
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: June 02, 2008, 07:29:15 PM »

and probably allowed Michael Wildes to waltz into Rothman's seat (ugh).
Huh

I've never heard of this guy, who is he?
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: June 02, 2008, 07:30:51 PM »

and probably allowed Michael Wildes to waltz into Rothman's seat (ugh).
Huh

I've never heard of this guy, who is he?

My mayor, and Ferriero's bosom buddy. He's had a congressional campaign fund open since 2006.
Logged
DownWithTheLeft
downwithdaleft
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,548
Italy


Political Matrix
E: 9.16, S: -3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: June 02, 2008, 07:32:02 PM »

and probably allowed Michael Wildes to waltz into Rothman's seat (ugh).
Huh

I've never heard of this guy, who is he?

My mayor, and Ferriero's bosom buddy. He's had a congressional campaign fund open since 2006.
Yikes, maybe I should feel grateful to have Rothman Tongue
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: June 02, 2008, 07:36:54 PM »

So how much is Lautenberg going to win by tomorrow?

Also, dwtl may onto something here.  It is only when the GOP nominates a completely incompetent candidate that it will actually win a Senate seat in NJ.  Fits with the state entirely.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: June 02, 2008, 07:37:44 PM »
« Edited: June 02, 2008, 07:39:47 PM by Verily »

So how much is Lautenberg going to win by tomorrow?

I'd say around twenty points, something like 55-35-10 (10 going to Cresitello). With obvious intense regional polarization. Andrews should win every county from Burlington south, while Lautenberg will win every county from Middlesex north (with the possible exception of Morris, where Cresitello might make the results strange or even win). I don't know much about the likely patterns of Sussex and Warren Counties, but they're basically irrelevant in a Democratic primary anyway.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: June 02, 2008, 07:43:21 PM »


Sabrin was the only who could string together a coherent sentence. 

I guess that's one redeeming quality of Sabrin. Then again, concerning his speaking, he loves using those terrible phrases like "liberal loser lobbyist" over and over again.

So how much is Lautenberg going to win by tomorrow?

I'd say around twenty points, something like 55-35-10 (10 going to Cresitello).

Are you serious? It won't be that bad for Andrews. And is Cresitello really expected to hit double digits after such minor exposure?

So how much is Lautenberg going to win by tomorrow?

Also, dwtl may onto something here.  It is only when the GOP nominates a completely incompetent candidate that it will actually win a Senate seat in NJ.  Fits with the state entirely.

Haha, how true. It's also funny that it seems like they're going to nominate someone like Pennacchio - the most conservative nominee for statewide office in decades - when this race had the potential for being the best showing for the GOP in quite some time.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: June 02, 2008, 07:47:53 PM »


Sabrin was the only who could string together a coherent sentence. 

I guess that's one redeeming quality of Sabrin. Then again, concerning his speaking, he loves using those terrible phrases like "liberal loser lobbyist" over and over again.

So how much is Lautenberg going to win by tomorrow?

I'd say around twenty points, something like 55-35-10 (10 going to Cresitello).

Are you serious? It won't be that bad for Andrews. And is Cresitello really expected to hit double digits after such minor exposure?

So how much is Lautenberg going to win by tomorrow?

Also, dwtl may onto something here.  It is only when the GOP nominates a completely incompetent candidate that it will actually win a Senate seat in NJ.  Fits with the state entirely.

Haha, how true. It's also funny that it seems like they're going to nominate someone like Pennacchio - the most conservative nominee for statewide office in decades - when this race had the potential for being the best showing for the GOP in quite some time.

I'm perfectly serious. Andrews has no appeal at all to North Jersey, and Lautenberg has no appeal at all to South Jersey. So people will just vote along regional lines, and those numbers are pretty much the North Jersey-South Jersey Democratic breakdown. Cresitello will get a substantial protest vote from people who hate both candidates and also from his home area in Morris County. He did poll at 9% (IIRC) in the one poll of the race.

I don't even know who I'm voting for yet, so you can't accuse me of bias Smiley
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: June 02, 2008, 07:50:45 PM »


I'm perfectly serious. Andrews has no appeal at all to North Jersey

Doesn't he have some serious machine support up there?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.065 seconds with 12 queries.