Kennedy/Smathers vs. Rockefeller/Reagan vs. Wallace/LeMay-1968

[Lincoln Republican]

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Rockefeller/Reagan                 353
Kennedy/Smathers                 119
Wallace/LeMay                          66

[Lincoln Republican]

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Rockefeller/Reagan                 353
Kennedy/Smathers                 119
Wallace/LeMay                          66

Winfield, back when I was young and naive, I used to believe you created good maps. This now proves that you don't, atleast in my mind. You are misunderestimating the power of a Kennedy, especially Bobby Kennedy. I highly doubt that he would do worse than what Old Hube did in RL (but that's another scenario and this is a different one). Please explain.

Sorry, I made a mistake. 

The map should look like this.

Rockefeller/Reagan                     403
Kennedy/Smathers                       69
Wallace/LeMay                             66

[Lincoln Republican]

I will be posting a realistic map of how I believe this election would have turned out.

[Lincoln Republican]

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Why would he do that to the son of his running mate?

Mitt Romney is Ronald Reagan's son?

Whoops, thought it said Romney, well none the less, why would Rockefeller whup Mitt Romney?

You may want to consider registering for a remedial reading course.

The subject is Kennedy/Smathers vs. Rockefeller/Reagan.

The only arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts who ever ran for President in the history of the U.S. was one spoiled brat Robert F. Kennedy, given a plum cabinet job by big brother John F. Kennedy.

Mitt Romney didn't need a big brother handing him a plum political appointment on a silver platter, as Robert Kennedy evidently did. 

[Lincoln Republican]

I will be posting a realistic map of how I believe this election would have turned out.

This?

Though obviously impossible, that would have been a sweet and well deserved result.

[Lincoln Republican]

Rockefeller wins a close, yet undisputed, victory.

Reagan helps the ticket considerably in Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Florida, Texas, Oklahoma.

The usually reliable Republican plains states, mountain states, southwest states, retain their party loyalty, and Reagan helps tip the balance in California, where he is very popular.

Ultimately, Rockefeller is viewed by the public as more prepared and more capable of handling the responsibilities of the Presidency than is Kennedy. 

Rockefeller/Reagan                     283
Kennedy/Smathers                      189
Wallace/LeMay                               66

[Lincoln Republican]

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Why would he do that to the son of his running mate?

Mitt Romney is Ronald Reagan's son?

Whoops, thought it said Romney, well none the less, why would Rockefeller whup Mitt Romney?

You may want to consider registering for a remedial reading course.

The subject is Kennedy/Smathers vs. Rockefeller/Reagan.

The only arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts who ever ran for President in the history of the U.S. was one spoiled brat Robert F. Kennedy, given a plum cabinet job by big brother John F. Kennedy.

Mitt Romney didn't need a big brother handing him a plum political appointment on a silver platter, as Robert Kennedy evidently did. 

Edit

But yes, I do see your humor here.

Good job.

[Lincoln Republican]

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Rockefeller/Reagan                 353
Kennedy/Smathers                 119
Wallace/LeMay                          66

Winfield, back when I was young and naive, I used to believe you created good maps. This now proves that you don't, atleast in my mind. You are misunderestimating the power of a Kennedy, especially Bobby Kennedy. I highly doubt that he would do worse than what Old Hube did in RL (but that's another scenario and this is a different one). Please explain.

You still are.

[Lincoln Republican]

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Rockefeller/Reagan                 353
Kennedy/Smathers                 119
Wallace/LeMay                          66

Winfield, back when I was young and naive, I used to believe you created good maps. This now proves that you don't, atleast in my mind. You are misunderestimating the power of a Kennedy, especially Bobby Kennedy. I highly doubt that he would do worse than what Old Hube did in RL (but that's another scenario and this is a different one). Please explain.

You still are.

How so? I admit I am young, considering I'm 15 now but I have gained a fair bit of experience on this forum.

Let me alter my reply slightly. 

You still are. 

[Lincoln Republican]

Rockefeller whups the arrogant upstart interloper from Massachusetts, who thinks he is entitled to the Presidency.

Rockefeller/Reagan                 353
Kennedy/Smathers                 119
Wallace/LeMay                          66

Winfield, back when I was young and naive, I used to believe you created good maps. This now proves that you don't, atleast in my mind. You are misunderestimating the power of a Kennedy, especially Bobby Kennedy. I highly doubt that he would do worse than what Old Hube did in RL (but that's another scenario and this is a different one). Please explain.

You still are.

How so? I admit I am young, considering I'm 15 now but I have gained a fair bit of experience on this forum.

Let me alter my reply slightly. 

You still are. 

No Winfield, let me alter my reply. If I'm young and naive, you must be a Republican hack .

But since you insist that you are not naive, then, by definition, I must not be a Republican hack.