OH/MO/KY-SurveyUSA: Clinton better positioned than Obama to beat McCain

[Bandit3 the Worker]

Either SurveyUSA made a misprint, or they're smoking some real powerful stuff over there.

Everyone knows Obama would do better than Clinton, so this is simply laughable.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

I will admit to not being an expert on the south, but it is my personal feeling that while Obama will likely rebound from the Wright scandal in the northern states among white voters, his reputation among southern white voters is tarnished enough to permanently count him out in those longshot southern states it was once thought he'd have a shot at winning.

He'll never rebound from this 100% in the south.

Maybe it's time to resume Reconstruction then.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

The guy believes that the Democrats consistently win elections in Kentucky, but the Republicans steal victory from them each and every time.

How do you explain the "vote hauling" double standard then?

[Bandit3 the Worker]

What's the effect of the Hagee scandal on McCain?

You know, the scandal the racist media won't cover.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

My take on these phony polls:

http://onlinelunchpail.blogspot.com/2008/03/everybodys-gone-surveysurveyusa.html

[Bandit3 the Worker]

That's some blog, Bandit.  Wow, it says you saw a survey taken last week showing Obama beating McCain in Kentucky?

This wasn't last week. This was a few weeks ago.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

2. Obama has never led McCain in poll of Kentucky.  The last SUSA poll to show a Dem up against McCain was last November.

I wasn't talking about just SurveyUSA polls. I was also talking about WTVQ and WHAS polls and such.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Riiiiight.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I know what the votes are, because I'm from the state being polled, and I actually get to listen to what people in Kentucky say.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

In the beginning, SurveyUSA is full of fart gas.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

I'm sorry, but I would much rather pay attention to an organization with a scientific method of measuring opinions than a guy with nothing but anecdotal evidence and a history of making things up to support his arguments.

You'd rather pay attention to an organization with a scientific method of measuring opinions than to Bush? Well, that's fair.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

Like I'm supposed to keep a link I thought I had no use for a month later.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

If you wanted the link so bad, you should have asked for it 3 weeks ago before I threw it away.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

How convenient.  Did you even attempt to tell anybody here about the existence of this poll three weeks ago?

Because people here seem so eager to post other polls, I just figured back then that someone posted it.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

Did you think to check?

I didn't know I had to babysit this website.

But apparently I do, considering the maturity level that's been displayed here today.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

Since you're the one who thinks the link is so important, find it yourself.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

The onus is on you to provide evidence for your own assertions.  Why should I search for something that most likely does not exist?

Because it bips.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

I give up with you.  You've been caught lying yet again, Bandit.  Next time you start spouting off an argument, back it up with facts.  Don't just make things up, or absolutely nobody will ever take you seriously.  I certainly can't.

The Obama-haters at ABC need to back up their arguments with facts.

[Bandit3 the Worker]

Bandit your deliusonal if you think Obama would do well in Kentucky.

He'd do great compared to Hillary.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Boone and Spencer are only 2 counties.