Hillary attacked a 12-year old rape victim in court
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 06, 2025, 01:23:07 PM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Hillary attacked a 12-year old rape victim in court
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Hillary attacked a 12-year old rape victim in court  (Read 1731 times)
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 25, 2008, 01:13:54 PM »


I would rather an action committee or something of that extent make an ad of this. I don't want to see Obama go negative.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,233
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 25, 2008, 01:14:44 PM »

This might be interesting without the "in court" bit.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 25, 2008, 01:22:03 PM »

I have to agree that while this certainly sounds bad, it was her job at the time. She was a court appointed lawyer for the defense, and it was her duty to give the defendant the best defense she possibly could. Sure, there might have been a better way to handle it, but I don't know enough about the case to suggest one.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,880


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 25, 2008, 01:51:46 PM »

Besides, people CHANGE. Attacking someone for what they did over 30 years ago is a tad ridiculous. People make mistakes. I suspect the vast majority of the people here, if put in the exact same situation would have done the same. It's easy to judge others and Clinton is getting way too much negative coverage.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,233
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 25, 2008, 01:54:24 PM »

Besides, people CHANGE. Attacking someone for what they did over 30 years ago is a tad ridiculous. People make mistakes. I suspect the vast majority of the people here, if put in the exact same situation would have done the same. It's easy to judge others and Clinton is getting way too much negative coverage.
"A tad"? This thread is just ridiculous hackishness.
Logged
8 out of 11 is not deserved
pollwatch99-b
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 548


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 25, 2008, 01:54:48 PM »

Besides, people CHANGE. Attacking someone for what they did over 30 years ago is a tad ridiculous. People make mistakes. I suspect the vast majority of the people here, if put in the exact same situation would have done the same. It's easy to judge others and Clinton is getting way too much negative coverage.

Some people never change.  Has Hillary ever admitted a mistake?  If she did just once then maybe people would cut her some slack
Logged
Wakie
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,767


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 25, 2008, 01:55:27 PM »

30 years ago Hillary was a COURT-APPOINTED defense lawyer who questioned the credibility of her client's accuser who happened to be a 12 y/o girl.

BRTD clearly feels she did wrong.

So ... what BRTD is saying is that if you are accused of rape you don't deserve to have your accuser's credibility questioned.  Goodness knows there has NEVER been a FALSE rape accusation.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,880


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 25, 2008, 01:57:12 PM »

Besides, people CHANGE. Attacking someone for what they did over 30 years ago is a tad ridiculous. People make mistakes. I suspect the vast majority of the people here, if put in the exact same situation would have done the same. It's easy to judge others and Clinton is getting way too much negative coverage.
"A tad"? This thread is just ridiculous hackishness.

Well, I meant in a general sense. This particular thread was ridiiculous for other reasons too of course.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 10 queries.