Will Connecticut be a swing state in 2008?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 06, 2025, 01:24:57 PM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Will Connecticut be a swing state in 2008?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Will Connecticut be a swing state in 2008?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 52

Author Topic: Will Connecticut be a swing state in 2008?  (Read 3271 times)
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,038


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 21, 2008, 07:57:50 PM »

Good thing McCain wants to run on gun rights and taxes.

Oh, wait.

NH is solid Dem.
Logged
Duke 🇺🇸
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,207


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 21, 2008, 08:03:52 PM »

Good thing McCain wants to run on gun rights and taxes.

Oh, wait.

NH is solid Dem.

Are you suggesting Obama will be more right on guns and taxes than McCain?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,038


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 21, 2008, 08:07:19 PM »

Good thing McCain wants to run on gun rights and taxes.

Oh, wait.

NH is solid Dem.

Are you suggesting Obama will be more right on guns and taxes than McCain?
No, I'm saying that gun rights probably will not be a salient issue in the 2008 general election.
Logged
Duke 🇺🇸
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,207


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 21, 2008, 08:09:24 PM »

Good thing McCain wants to run on gun rights and taxes.

Oh, wait.

NH is solid Dem.

Are you suggesting Obama will be more right on guns and taxes than McCain?
No, I'm saying that gun rights probably will not be a salient issue in the 2008 general election.

Probably not ... but I don't think the Iraq war will be a major issue either in the 2008 general election. It will be about taxes, the economy, immigration, and healthcare.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,038


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 21, 2008, 08:10:55 PM »

Good thing McCain wants to run on gun rights and taxes.

Oh, wait.

NH is solid Dem.

Are you suggesting Obama will be more right on guns and taxes than McCain?
No, I'm saying that gun rights probably will not be a salient issue in the 2008 general election.

Probably not ... but I don't think the Iraq war will be a major issue either in the 2008 general election. It will be about taxes, the economy, immigration, and healthcare.
How does John McCain run on those things though? He's naturally a war president, not a domestic issue president. I'd guess that he would try to focus the race on foreign policy.
Logged
Duke 🇺🇸
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,207


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 21, 2008, 08:17:11 PM »

Good thing McCain wants to run on gun rights and taxes.

Oh, wait.

NH is solid Dem.

Are you suggesting Obama will be more right on guns and taxes than McCain?
No, I'm saying that gun rights probably will not be a salient issue in the 2008 general election.

Probably not ... but I don't think the Iraq war will be a major issue either in the 2008 general election. It will be about taxes, the economy, immigration, and healthcare.
How does John McCain run on those things though? He's naturally a war president, not a domestic issue president. I'd guess that he would try to focus the race on foreign policy.

I don't know how McCain will run his campaign, just as well as I don't know how Obama will run his campaign--except there will be "change." I know Obama is not a war President. I imagine McCain will run on cutting spending and pork, keeping the tax cuts permanent as long as spending is held in check, etc ..
Logged
หมูเด้ง
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,936
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 21, 2008, 09:20:13 PM »

Connecticut is out of reach. Get over it. It will probably go 56-43
Logged
Angel of Death
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,454
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 21, 2008, 11:35:19 PM »

I forgot, is it BRTD or jfern who would have tended to phrase the options as follows?

  • Yes (AHDuke99)
  • No (sane)
Logged
Duke 🇺🇸
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,207


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: February 21, 2008, 11:44:22 PM »

I forgot, is it BRTD or jfern who would have tended to phrase the options as follows?

  • Yes (AHDuke99)
  • No (sane)

I voted no, but whatever.
Logged
Angel of Death
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,454
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: February 21, 2008, 11:48:16 PM »

I forgot, is it BRTD or jfern who would have tended to phrase the options as follows?

  • Yes (AHDuke99)
  • No (sane)

I voted no, but whatever.

For what it's worth, I'm not particularly a fan of this kind of "push polling".
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: February 22, 2008, 09:00:22 AM »

McCain can't win Kerry (or Gore) states.

...but Obama can win safe Bush states?

Well see Phil, there wan ARG poll of eight Utah college students that show Obama up by 5 points there, so clearly Obama will win everything, everywhere.  Every precinct in America will go 100% for Obama, except for one small precinct in Arizona where they allow McCain to vote for himself.  I fail to understand why we are even having an election, when clearly Obama will win the election with 105% of the vote.  Clearly the campaigns should be ended, polls should be closed, and no more voting should occur since the dude who was a state legislator just four years ago will so clearly defeat an American hero.

youre right.

ive been advocating for some time that we just call off the election and all stand in line to kiss the feet of the great obama.

anyone who can pile up present votes in the illinois state legislature and spit out mindless platitudes (that others have written) has to be damn close to perfect.

we should appoint him president for life!
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,102


Political Matrix
E: -0.65, S: 0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 22, 2008, 09:02:18 AM »

If Hillary is the nominee, it's possible. I'd still say the Dems will win it, but McCain could pick up some votes, and posisbly gain Fairfield and Litchfield Counties.
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,630
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: February 22, 2008, 09:07:38 AM »

I don't think that Connecticut will be a swing state in 2008.  All of the Northeast states have been trending so hard to the left that I think in the end all of them will be out of reach for Republicans.

I don't think that McCain could take any of the Kerry states.  Even Wisconsin, which was so close in '04, will likely break further in the Democratic direction because this election is not about a 51% strategy.  It's about unifying people.

Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,849


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 22, 2008, 02:07:39 PM »

The anti-war state of Connecticut must've gotten confused when voting for Lieberman last year.

They did when Lieberman ran ads promising to bring our soldiers home from war, and campaigned largely on lunch-pail issues and his own independence.

Lieberman tempered his hawkishness for the campaign.
Logged
falling apart like the ashes of American flags
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 118,485
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 22, 2008, 02:10:09 PM »

The anti-war state of Connecticut must've gotten confused when voting for Lieberman last year.

They did when Lieberman ran ads promising to bring our soldiers home from war, and campaigned largely on lunch-pail issues and his own independence.

Lieberman tempered his hawkishness for the campaign.

And now polls show that Lieberman would lose.
Logged
Joe Kakistocracy
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,754
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 22, 2008, 02:17:57 PM »


Poll.  I've corrected you on this already this week.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,714
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: February 22, 2008, 02:23:51 PM »

This thread is hilarious. As was that map.

There are hacks all around us. In our schools...in our workplaces...even in our homes.
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: February 22, 2008, 07:55:16 PM »

No way.  McCain will push New England even further away than Bush did.

Whereas Romney would have made it tossup!  Romney 2012!
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: February 22, 2008, 07:58:14 PM »

Good thing McCain wants to run on gun rights and taxes.

Oh, wait.

NH is solid Dem.

Are you suggesting Obama will be more right on guns and taxes than McCain?
No, I'm saying that gun rights probably will not be a salient issue in the 2008 general election.

Probably not ... but I don't think the Iraq war will be a major issue either in the 2008 general election. It will be about taxes, the economy, immigration, and healthcare.
How does John McCain run on those things though? He's naturally a war president, not a domestic issue president. I'd guess that he would try to focus the race on foreign policy.

I don't know how McCain will run his campaign, just as well as I don't know how Obama will run his campaign--except there will be "change." I know Obama is not a war President. I imagine McCain will run on cutting spending and pork, keeping the tax cuts permanent as long as spending is held in check, etc ..

McCain's "the economy is not my strong suit" line certainly won't be much help.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,904
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: February 22, 2008, 08:10:13 PM »

Good thing McCain wants to run on gun rights and taxes.

Oh, wait.

NH is solid Dem.

Are you suggesting Obama will be more right on guns and taxes than McCain?
No, I'm saying that gun rights probably will not be a salient issue in the 2008 general election.

Probably not ... but I don't think the Iraq war will be a major issue either in the 2008 general election. It will be about taxes, the economy, immigration, and healthcare.
How does John McCain run on those things though? He's naturally a war president, not a domestic issue president. I'd guess that he would try to focus the race on foreign policy.

I don't know how McCain will run his campaign, just as well as I don't know how Obama will run his campaign--except there will be "change." I know Obama is not a war President. I imagine McCain will run on cutting spending and pork, keeping the tax cuts permanent as long as spending is held in check, etc ..

McCain's "the economy is not my strong suit" line certainly won't be much help.

Nor will this picture:

Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 8 queries.