huck as a third party candidate?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 06, 2025, 01:24:52 PM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  huck as a third party candidate?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: huck as a third party candidate?  (Read 1659 times)
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 21, 2008, 03:06:49 PM »

how likely is it?

id say it is pretty unlikely, especially if huck has any future presidential plans.

but then again, maybe huck thinks his future in the republican party is probably done anyway..why not go for it?

the mccain camp has to be worried of such a possibility.
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2008, 03:09:28 PM »

He will not do it, Huckabee will run in 2012 if McCain loses the GE.
Logged
AndrewTX
AndrewCT
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,102


Political Matrix
E: -0.65, S: 0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2008, 03:11:17 PM »

0% chance. He's gonna wait till 2012, regardless if McCain wins or lose.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,024
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2008, 03:20:43 PM »


No.  Huckabee is a Republican, and he has no intentions of going against the GOP in a third-party run.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,904
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2008, 04:02:54 PM »

No, Huckabee is a Republican through and through. Given that he's from Arkansas, a state with an aenemic republican state party, it would probably have been just as easy for him to be a blue dog, but he became a Republican, which signifies to me that he is a true believer who won't abandon his party.
Logged
TomC
TCash101
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,093


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2008, 04:06:02 PM »

Yeah, what they said
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2008, 04:56:03 PM »

I'll be generous and say maybe a 3% chance.
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2008, 05:49:31 PM »

He will not do it, Huckabee will run in 2012 if McCain loses the GE.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2008, 09:42:02 PM »

No, Huckabee will not run as an independent in 2008.

If he does run in 2012, he will lose as badly as he has in 2008.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 22, 2008, 03:23:27 AM »

No chance in hell.

Huckabee will do the right thing and wait until 2012.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 22, 2008, 10:26:16 AM »

I don't think Huckabee wants to run a third party campaign.  I give it a 3% chance.
Logged
perdedor
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,638


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 22, 2008, 11:53:52 AM »

As a Democrat, it's a great fantasy. However, as a realist, it's silly to even think about.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 22, 2008, 01:03:25 PM »

  Purge the disgusting religious element. 

Thanks for that.

If you have such a problem with us stupid religious folk, leave the damn party. You aren't just picking on far right wing evangelicals when you say "disgusting religious element" either.
Logged
Duke 🇺🇸
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,207


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 22, 2008, 01:11:03 PM »

That would be awesome.  Completely remove the religious right from the party.  Then replace the Bush Republican standard with the McCain Republican standard and we're getting somewhere!  Granted we won't be anywhere near where we used to or should be as a party, but it's a start.  Purge the disgusting religious element.  Yes, we will lose quite handily, but it'll send an important message.

Why are you a Republican? We'd lose every election without the religious right. It would be disastrous for our party.

Anyway, Huckabee will not run on a third party ticket. He has no reason to do it.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,714
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 22, 2008, 01:15:48 PM »

That would be awesome.  Completely remove the religious right from the party.  Then replace the Bush Republican standard with the McCain Republican standard and we're getting somewhere!  Granted we won't be anywhere near where we used to or should be as a party, but it's a start.  Purge the disgusting religious element.  Yes, we will lose quite handily, but it'll send an important message.

Why are you a Republican? We'd lose every election without the religious right. It would be disastrous for our party.

Anyway, Huckabee will not run on a third party ticket. He has no reason to do it.

And until 1992, the Democrats lost every election without the Solid South. They've survived. A religious-rightless GOP would mean, in several decades, a far better political discourse in America.
Logged
Duke 🇺🇸
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,207


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 22, 2008, 01:43:45 PM »

That would be awesome.  Completely remove the religious right from the party.  Then replace the Bush Republican standard with the McCain Republican standard and we're getting somewhere!  Granted we won't be anywhere near where we used to or should be as a party, but it's a start.  Purge the disgusting religious element.  Yes, we will lose quite handily, but it'll send an important message.

Why are you a Republican? We'd lose every election without the religious right. It would be disastrous for our party.

Anyway, Huckabee will not run on a third party ticket. He has no reason to do it.

And until 1992, the Democrats lost every election without the Solid South. They've survived. A religious-rightless GOP would mean, in several decades, a far better political discourse in America.

Will those people lose their faith or just not vote? Forming a third party that is just religious conservatives would actually do well in the deep south. It would also create a permanent Democrat majority, which won't be good at all.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,714
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 22, 2008, 02:39:36 PM »

That would be awesome.  Completely remove the religious right from the party.  Then replace the Bush Republican standard with the McCain Republican standard and we're getting somewhere!  Granted we won't be anywhere near where we used to or should be as a party, but it's a start.  Purge the disgusting religious element.  Yes, we will lose quite handily, but it'll send an important message.

Why are you a Republican? We'd lose every election without the religious right. It would be disastrous for our party.

Anyway, Huckabee will not run on a third party ticket. He has no reason to do it.

And until 1992, the Democrats lost every election without the Solid South. They've survived. A religious-rightless GOP would mean, in several decades, a far better political discourse in America.

Will those people lose their faith or just not vote? Forming a third party that is just religious conservatives would actually do well in the deep south. It would also create a permanent Democrat majority, which won't be good at all.

Democratic. Get it right.

And what I mean is that they would lose their influence.
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 22, 2008, 04:48:27 PM »

  Purge the disgusting religious element. 

Thanks for that.

If you have such a problem with us stupid religious folk, leave the damn party. You aren't just picking on far right wing evangelicals when you say "disgusting religious element" either.

I have a problem with stupid religious folk, but not all religious folk.  I do think there are too many of the former in the GOP.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 22, 2008, 05:34:44 PM »


Actually, yes I am only picking on the right-wing evangelicals.  In saying disgusting religious element I wasn't linking "disgusting" with "religious", I was linking it with "religious element".  That refers specifically to the far right nuts that are forcing us towards populism.  And I'm not leaving, it's our Party.

So why should they leave? It's just as much their party as it is your's.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 22, 2008, 05:39:53 PM »

Actually, yes I am only picking on the right-wing evangelicals.  In saying disgusting religious element I wasn't linking "disgusting" with "religious", I was linking it with "religious element".  That refers specifically to the far right nuts that are forcing us towards populism.  And I'm not leaving, it's our Party.
So why should they leave? It's just as much their party as it is your's.

Honestly, because it was ours first.  They want big government and social control, this Party is supposed to be the Party of small government and limited social intervention.

Parties evolve (not that I'm supporting a move to the left).
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 22, 2008, 05:44:29 PM »

You're going more for the relgious right then, you want a lot of (me included) social conservatives and economic moderates to leave the party. Have fun winning any national elections!
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 22, 2008, 05:52:22 PM »

The suburbs, urban areas, and pretty much anywhere with a good amount of people are more inclined to vote for the old values of our Party as opposed to the new ones.  Hence the extreme trend away from the Republican Party.  The populists have the Appalachians and poor people.

Urban areas don't like populists? I've heard it all now.  Tongue
Logged
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: February 22, 2008, 05:53:54 PM »
« Edited: February 22, 2008, 05:56:52 PM by Bourbon Democrat »

That would be awesome.  Completely remove the religious right from the party.  Then replace the Bush Republican standard with the McCain Republican standard and we're getting somewhere!  Granted we won't be anywhere near where we used to or should be as a party, but it's a start.  Purge the disgusting religious element.  Yes, we will lose quite handily, but it'll send an important message.
The problem is that the religious demagoguery is largely the only way to really promote most of your agenda. If it wasn't for the pandering to the fundamentalists and super patriots, they'd just view the GOP as the Country Club Party. Of course the side effect is that there's a real chance of the business/secular elites being ousted for real as every other faction outnumbers them.

Of course if the GOP just took a more regional/local approach to social issues and invited economic moderates AND conservatives into the party they could be viable still. As it stands, the Democrats have flirted more with that strategy since 2006 (but you wouldn't know it by this election).
Logged
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: February 22, 2008, 06:05:43 PM »
« Edited: February 22, 2008, 06:10:00 PM by Bourbon Democrat »

The suburbs, urban areas, and pretty much anywhere with a good amount of people are more inclined to vote for the old values of our Party as opposed to the new ones.  Hence the extreme trend away from the Republican Party.  The populists have the Appalachians and poor people.
Define 'old values.'

Most of the reason why the GOP has continued to do well in spite of losing a lot of their old voter getters/scapegoats (like welfare cheats) is because of security issues (crime, immigration, terrorism, etc.). But with the neo-Con foreign policy discredited, illegal immigration worse than ever, and crime still at historical lows it's lost ground there. The GOP really has nothing to offer financially strained middle Americans. Social Issues are a mixed bag in terms of their appeal. Personally I think the Republicans would be doing themselves and the rest of the country a favor if they went back to 'states rights' instead of trying to push a 'conservative' (re: reactionary) agenda through Washington.
Logged
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: February 22, 2008, 06:15:34 PM »
« Edited: February 22, 2008, 06:22:31 PM by Bourbon Democrat »

That would be awesome.  Completely remove the religious right from the party.  Then replace the Bush Republican standard with the McCain Republican standard and we're getting somewhere!  Granted we won't be anywhere near where we used to or should be as a party, but it's a start.  Purge the disgusting religious element.  Yes, we will lose quite handily, but it'll send an important message.
The problem is that the religious demagoguery is largely the only way to really promote most of your agenda. If it wasn't for the pandering to the fundamentalists and super patriots, they'd just view the GOP as the Country Club Party. Of course the side effect is that there's a real chance of the business/secular elites being ousted for real as every other faction outnumbers them.

That's better than being known as the Party of the uneducated.  We are losing power because we no longer appeal to a wide variety of people, just southerners.  We are losing the northeast, the west, and the midwest.  We can't win on the southern strategy, it's fatally flawed.  The south is not the entire country and we are rapidly becoming a Party only for southerners.  If we stress principled freedom as opposed to mandated morality, we'd be much better off.
Oh I agree mostly. Demographics are working against the GOP now. The party 'base' is basically only a dwindling group of white male protestants. But the GOP couldn't really pursue as conservative of an economic policy as you want to stay viable. In order to drop the fundies, it would need to moderate on economic issues and present itself as able to defend america again as opposed to just being trigger happy.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 10 queries.