To all those who said it was better for Clinton: Intrade disagrees.
That doesn't mean anything at all, actually.
Did Clinton win what she was expected to win? Did Obama win what he was expected to win?
Simple as that.
You're right. Clinton won everything she was expected to win except Missouri. However, she also picked up California and New Jersey, both states she was not expected to perform too well in. Even more unexpected for Hillary was the large lead she enjoyed in California.
Obama, on the other hand, won almost everything he was expected to win, plus Missouri. He did, however, lose two states that should have gone his way--two states that were polling his way, and were expected to go his way: California and New Jersey. Those are two very big losses for him, while Hillary really didn't have any huge upsets (she didn't lose Missouri by more than a percentage point, and in fact carried the state the whole night up until the last few precincts came in. (I might count Massachusetts as well, given his endorsements from the state's two senators and governor, but I'm not sure how polling was up to yesterday's vote.)
Hillary leads in the delegate race. She leads in the popular vote, when combining the vote totals from each state so far. That's what you call a winner.