Smith vs. Hoover 1932 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 03:21:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Smith vs. Hoover 1932 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Smith vs. Hoover 1932  (Read 2378 times)
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW
« on: August 12, 2004, 11:51:50 AM »

Hoover was saddly doomed in 1932, unless the Bonus Army did not occur.

Smith would win, but not in a landslide like FDR did. A third party, the Consitutional Democrats, would run a candidate for the South due to anger over Al Smith's Catholicism.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2004, 12:46:00 PM »

Hoover was saddly doomed in 1932, unless the Bonus Army did not occur.

oh come on. it's not like the Great Depression had anything to do with it.

The south voted for Smith in 1928 in spite of his Catholicism, so I don't see why they wouldn't again.

Hoover won such states as Texas, Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Kentucky, and Tennessee in 1928. All of those states but Kentucky were former Confederate States. The ststes that did go to Smith were super partisan Democratic states like South Carolina.

The Bonus Army cost Hoover reelection. Even FDR told his aide Harold Ickes, "This elects me" when he heard about the Bonus Army Disaster.

Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2004, 06:36:07 PM »



Al Smith/Claude Pepper: 350

Herbert Hoover/Charles Curtis: 181

If no independent Southern candidate ran this would happen. I might be guilty of being biased to my hero.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.