Smith vs. Hoover 1932
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 08:04:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Smith vs. Hoover 1932
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Smith vs. Hoover 1932  (Read 2368 times)
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,913
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 12, 2004, 12:29:28 AM »

what would a rematch look like? would the Great Depression do Hoover in or was Smith's baggage still too much?

I say:



sorry PBrunsel, but Hoover was beyond toast.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2004, 12:33:26 AM »

I think that there were so many people angry at Hoover and his so-called Hoovervilles that you could have put up a banana peel as the Democratic candidate and it would have won in a landslide.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,913
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2004, 12:37:49 AM »

Can you imagine PBrunsel during the time period? He'd get into an argument on every street corner defending Hoover, lol.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2004, 11:51:50 AM »

Hoover was saddly doomed in 1932, unless the Bonus Army did not occur.

Smith would win, but not in a landslide like FDR did. A third party, the Consitutional Democrats, would run a candidate for the South due to anger over Al Smith's Catholicism.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,913
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2004, 12:23:23 PM »

Hoover was saddly doomed in 1932, unless the Bonus Army did not occur.

oh come on. it's not like the Great Depression had anything to do with it.

The south voted for Smith in 1928 in spite of his Catholicism, so I don't see why they wouldn't again.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2004, 12:46:00 PM »

Hoover was saddly doomed in 1932, unless the Bonus Army did not occur.

oh come on. it's not like the Great Depression had anything to do with it.

The south voted for Smith in 1928 in spite of his Catholicism, so I don't see why they wouldn't again.

Hoover won such states as Texas, Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Kentucky, and Tennessee in 1928. All of those states but Kentucky were former Confederate States. The ststes that did go to Smith were super partisan Democratic states like South Carolina.

The Bonus Army cost Hoover reelection. Even FDR told his aide Harold Ickes, "This elects me" when he heard about the Bonus Army Disaster.

Logged
Schmitz in 1972
Liberty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,317
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2004, 05:10:07 PM »

Hoover was saddly doomed in 1932, unless the Bonus Army did not occur.

oh come on. it's not like the Great Depression had anything to do with it.

The south voted for Smith in 1928 in spite of his Catholicism, so I don't see why they wouldn't again.

Hoover won such states as Texas, Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Kentucky, and Tennessee in 1928. All of those states but Kentucky were former Confederate States. The ststes that did go to Smith were super partisan Democratic states like South Carolina.
1928 was the only time (not counting reconstruction) that Virginia voted for a Republican until 1952.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2004, 06:36:07 PM »



Al Smith/Claude Pepper: 350

Herbert Hoover/Charles Curtis: 181

If no independent Southern candidate ran this would happen. I might be guilty of being biased to my hero.
Logged
Schmitz in 1972
Liberty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,317
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2004, 07:25:47 PM »

It looks good to me PBrunsel, but I would have had Hoover winning Michigan
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,913
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2004, 08:10:25 PM »

and NJ, as it barely voted for FDR.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.222 seconds with 12 queries.