North Dakota 1892 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 09:16:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  North Dakota 1892 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: North Dakota 1892  (Read 9441 times)
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« on: February 08, 2004, 12:54:52 PM »

I don't know for sure, but I guess the electors just voted that way.

That does seem likely... Wink
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2004, 02:44:25 PM »

I know, but what is the 'Fusion' Party?

Isn't that what Kevin Lamoreau called the Superman party in the Superman v Lincoln what-if?
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2004, 02:54:58 PM »

Isn't that what Kevin Lamoreau called the Superman party in the Superman v Lincoln what-if?
I don't know.

Well, check it out, I'm fairly sure.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2004, 10:07:40 AM »

Isn't that what Kevin Lamoreau called the Superman party in the Superman v Lincoln what-if?
I don't know.

Well, check it out, I'm fairly sure.
Yeah, you're right, he did.

That's kind of cool, huh?
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2004, 06:20:27 PM »

Well, from the North Dakota page itself...

"Two electors from the Democratic-Populist Fusion ticket won and one Republican Elector won. This created a split delegation of electors: one for Weaver, one for Harrison, and one for Cleveland."

In other words, North Dakota, as did many other states at that time, allowed voters to vote for each elector seperately. Voters could cast up to 3 votes for electors, and there were 6 choices on the ballot: 3 Democratic-Populist electors (either 2 Democrats and one Populist or 2 Populists and one Democrat) and 3 Republican electors. The 3 electors who got the most votes were the Electors who were chosen. The names of the electors were printed on the ballot as well as which candidate they supported. In this case, the 3 electors who won were one for each party.

Well, that settles that I guess. Smiley Thanks Nym90! Smiley
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2004, 07:20:31 AM »

I guess my legacy lives on.  I haven't been nearly as active in posting lately (I'd like to say it was because I was too busy, but I really spend just as much time on the internet as I used to; I've just gotten lazy and don't make many posts).

In think it's nice that a small state like North Dakota has an interesting electoral fact like that to hold onto.  North Dakota was not the first state to give three Presidential candidates electoral votes (Maryland did in 1812, and other states may have as well), but it is the only state to split its electoral votes evenly among three candidates.

Sincerely,

Kevin Lamoreau

Yes, it sure does! Smiley You should give attention to this forum, t's the best one around... Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.