Opinion of the preceding poster's PM score

[Хahar 🤔]

will be at least 5 points more conservative economically in 3 years.

In that case, I'd still be to the left of you.
Boring generic liberal score.

[Sensei]

will be at least 5 points more conservative economically in 3 years.

In that case, I'd still be to the left of you.
Boring generic liberal score.

How do you figure?

[minionofmidas]

Most honorable and serene score.

[bullmoose88]

Not as negative as I thought it would be.

[minionofmidas]

Not as negative as I thought it would be.

That's because it's obtained by boycotting the "very important" button.

[bullmoose88]

Not as negative as I thought it would be.

That's because it's obtained by boycotting the "very important" button.

Is astonished Lewis does not use the "very important" button.

[minionofmidas]

Not as negative as I thought it would be.

That's because it's obtained by boycotting the "very important" button.

Is astonished Lewis does not use the "very important" button.

Well, the problem is: Lots of the questions are badly worded and/or my positions don't fit the answer options well. Using the "this issue is very important to me" button leads to oversampling the issues where such problems don't crop up - there are issues that are important to me where I wouldn't use the button because I'm not content with the poll options - which in turn leads not only to a more extreme score but also to a much more marked, and I think: misleading, gap between my economic and social scores. After all, the reason politics revolves mostly around social issues these days is that the answers are so much easier.

EDIT: Just noticed that the score I'm displaying actually has a stronger negative economic than social score... making for misleading reading. What I meant was that using that button leads to a much more negative social score.

[jesmo]

Pretty far left, but not unreasonable.

S: +3
E: 0

[War on Want]

Not bad socially, but really needs to open up his mind on Economics.

[Хahar 🤔]

Not as negative as I thought it would be.

That's because it's obtained by boycotting the "very important" button.

Is astonished Lewis does not use the "very important" button.

Well, the problem is: Lots of the questions are badly worded and/or my positions don't fit the answer options well. Using the "this issue is very important to me" button leads to oversampling the issues where such problems don't crop up - there are issues that are important to me where I wouldn't use the button because I'm not content with the poll options - which in turn leads not only to a more extreme score but also to a much more marked, and I think: misleading, gap between my economic and social scores. After all, the reason politics revolves mostly around social issues these days is that the answers are so much easier.

EDIT: Just noticed that the score I'm displaying actually has a stronger negative economic than social score... making for misleading reading. What I meant was that using that button leads to a much more negative social score.

Nope. My score is a fairly clear refutation of your theory.
Why is the E so low? I expected it to be closer to mine.

[War on Want]

My E is much lower because of my shifting ideals on Protectionism. I used to think it was great and now I don't think it is all good and I support Fair Trade with other countries and a restructuring of how America does Free Trade agreements.

[Sensei]

pretty similar to my own score, except a touch more liberal economically. Might get more conservative with age, like what I said about Xahar, except not as dramatic.

[Хahar 🤔]

will be at least 5 points more conservative economically in 3 years.

In that case, I'd still be to the left of you.
Boring generic liberal score.

How do you figure?

What do you mean?

My comments about the score stand.

[Sensei]

will be at least 5 points more conservative economically in 3 years.

In that case, I'd still be to the left of you.
Boring generic liberal score.

How do you figure?

What do you mean?

My comments about the score stand.

you move five points right, and you'd still be to the left of me economically?

[Robespierre's Jaw]

Traditional mainstream Democratic PM score, in my personal opinion.

[Хahar 🤔]

will be at least 5 points more conservative economically in 3 years.

In that case, I'd still be to the left of you.
Boring generic liberal score.

How do you figure?

What do you mean?

My comments about the score stand.

you move five points right, and you'd still be to the left of me economically?

Left in general, and only right economically by .04 point.
[skip]

[Filuwaúrdjan]

Sosial score surprisingly low

[War on Want]

Very good score, I think your social score is a little to far to the right, bring it back 2 points and it is perfect.

[tik 🪀✨]

Joe Sweatpants Leftist sort of score. Dime a dozen around here. Your social score needs to be lower, too. Let freedom ring, son. Let freedom ring.

[Robespierre's Jaw]

I would have imagined you to be the Economic moderate type Tik, maybe -1 on the Economic front would suit you more.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Big difference between economic and social.

[Robespierre's Jaw]

I guess I can call you a Populist now .

[NDN]

Looks dead accurate, and definitely a shift in the right direction.

[DWPerry]

Not much different than my own, I'm surprised he's a Dem.

[Torie]

I'm surprised he's not a Pubbie.