With only the comfort zone, Dems will need a sweep in both 2026 and 2028 for a full Senate majority
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2025, 10:39:43 AM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Virginiá, KaiserDave)
  With only the comfort zone, Dems will need a sweep in both 2026 and 2028 for a full Senate majority
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: With only the comfort zone, Dems will need a sweep in both 2026 and 2028 for a full Senate majority  (Read 471 times)
Empress Beatrix
NoMoore28
Rookie
**
Posts: 190


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 24, 2025, 08:28:34 AM »

Their comfort zone is the Biden 2020 states plus North Carolina

If they hold the rest and pick up ME and NC, they only get to 49 in 2026

If they do that, hold the rest in 2028, and pick up WI and NC they get to 51

There is zero room for error unless they start winning outside of their comfort zone.
Logged
Existing in the context
Patrick97
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,857
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2025, 08:43:33 AM »

I mean people said that in 2005 and 2017 and they ended up getting it.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,266


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2025, 08:47:26 AM »

I mean people said that in 2005 and 2017 and they ended up getting it.

Even in those cycles there was a bit more nuance because of ticket splitting. Today, they either need a clean sweep of the conventionally blue states + swing states (with potential for a screw up for a tie in 2028) or have to win in a double-digit Trump state. There’s no other option.
Logged
Empress Beatrix
NoMoore28
Rookie
**
Posts: 190


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2025, 09:35:47 AM »

I mean people said that in 2005 and 2017 and they ended up getting it.
They had a larger and more diverse “comfort zone” back then, along with ticket splitting for states like Montana and West Virginia which are now gone.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,297
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2025, 09:39:57 AM »

Indeed, but a bad enough environment for Republicans in 2026 could potentially give Democrats one of the reach seats.

I say this because if Trump had been President in 2022, for instance, Johnson certainly goes down, Budd too probably, and McMullin or Ryan possibly pull off an upset.

And you bet your ass that Democrats are going to at least try and run the table on offense in hopes of getting at least that one upset in 2026. Ideally more to pad a future majority.

I'm not saying it's a certainty, but it is necessary to try.
Logged
Existing in the context
Patrick97
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,857
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2025, 09:59:07 AM »

I mean people said that in 2005 and 2017 and they ended up getting it.
They had a larger and more diverse “comfort zone” back then, along with ticket splitting for states like Montana and West Virginia which are now gone.

We literally said that back in 2017 that Democrats missed a lot of gettable seats the year before. Nobody thought they would sweep both seats in AZ and GA. Like you said they have a path now and partisanship can only carry a flawed candidate by so much. If Democrats win in 2028 then odds are they have the senate.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,733
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2025, 11:49:28 AM »

I mean people said that in 2005 and 2017 and they ended up getting it.

In 2005, Democrats ended up expanding the map. In 2017 they sort of didn't, but they got extremely lucky with multiple bites at the pie (two of their gains in 2020 were special elections in seats that shouldn't have been voting that cycle at all). Both times they also held more "legacy red seats": today they hold no Senate seats in double-digit Republican states, while before this cycle Tester/Brown/Manchin were all still incumbents.

My guess is that Democrats will either expand the map, like in 2006, or fail to take the Senate. I think there are hints from the 2024 results -- especially the Osborn/Fischer race -- that expanding the map is actually a doable thing and polarization is generally falling.
Logged
Mr.Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 98,366
Jamaica


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2025, 06:57:35 PM »
« Edited: January 26, 2025, 03:26:33 AM by Mr.Bakari-Sellers »

We only need 50 seats plus the VP so we don't need 4 only 3
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 9 queries.