Nominating the VP was a key strategic error from Dems
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2025, 11:28:39 AM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: muon2, GeorgiaModerate, Spiral, 100% pro-life no matter what, Crumpets)
  Nominating the VP was a key strategic error from Dems
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Nominating the VP was a key strategic error from Dems  (Read 765 times)
Crane
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,113
South Africa


Political Matrix
E: -6.00, S: -2.21

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 29, 2024, 11:45:17 PM »

The current administration has 36% approval. People wanted it fired. Why did Dems choose a top figure from this massively unpopular admin to be their nominee? Anyone with a prayer of winning would have had to distance themselves from the President massively.

As VP, I don't think Kamala could have distanced herself enough to win, yet she didn't even try...

Silence, Republican (and possible sock)

Let's be honest, is he wrong?

For the next four years, any bad faith troll who voted to re-elect the worst president of all time doesn't get to whine or lecture anybody about the previous administration.

This was his error and will be his reckoning.

You and anyone of that mould are starting to sound like the Japanese holdouts still thinking they were fighting WWII.
Trump won. Fighting as if the last war never ended sounds like a great way to lose the next one.

It worked for Trump. It worked for his idol, Jackson. It worked for Cleveland. It worked for Reagan. And on some level it worked for Biden and Nixon and Bush Jr.

It's actually striking how similar Trump and Jackson are.

I was reading about Jackson's 1828 campaign earlier. The theme of the campaign was a personality cult around Jackson and a JQA smear campaign. It had little to do with actual policy. Jackson touted a connection to Jefferson, who was by then a party icon and had an earlier relationship with him, but who reportedly lambasted Jackson in private as dangerous and a threat to the country's constitutional order despite their ideological similarities. Sounds similar to how Reagan would have reacted to Trump in 2024.

And, of course.... unlikable VP who stands to inherits the economic disaster his predecessor creates.
Logged
インターネット掲示板ユーザー Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 51,096
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 30, 2024, 09:56:40 PM »

The current administration has 36% approval. People wanted it fired. Why did Dems choose a top figure from this massively unpopular admin to be their nominee? Anyone with a prayer of winning would have had to distance themselves from the President massively.

As VP, I don't think Kamala could have distanced herself enough to win, yet she didn't even try...

Silence, Republican (and possible sock)

Let's be honest, is he wrong?

For the next four years, any bad faith troll who voted to re-elect the worst president of all time doesn't get to whine or lecture anybody about the previous administration.

This was his error and will be his reckoning.

You and anyone of that mould are starting to sound like the Japanese holdouts still thinking they were fighting WWII.
Trump won. Fighting as if the last war never ended sounds like a great way to lose the next one.

It worked for Trump. It worked for his idol, Jackson. It worked for Cleveland. It worked for Reagan. And on some level it worked for Biden and Nixon and Bush Jr.
You seem to be confident we have a Jackson-tier figure in the wings, with the same structural forces adding wind to his sails. Can we really just assume that?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 9 queries.