What the 2003 elections (Ca. Miss. Ky. & La) mean for 2004 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 01:41:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  What the 2003 elections (Ca. Miss. Ky. & La) mean for 2004 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What the 2003 elections (Ca. Miss. Ky. & La) mean for 2004  (Read 20211 times)
Demrepdan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,305
« on: November 17, 2003, 10:04:02 PM »
« edited: November 17, 2003, 10:05:06 PM by Demrepdan »
Mississippi and Kentucky will undoubtedly vote Republican in 2004. Lousiana has a 97% chance of voting Republican. So Kentucky, Mississippi, and Lousiana are pretty much set. But just because Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, won the Gubernatorial election, doesn't  mean that California has ANY chance to vote for Bush. California only elects moderate Republicans as best. Which Arnold pretty much is. And this has mostly been seen more at just the state level. Bush will not win California in 2004.
Logged
Demrepdan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,305
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2003, 09:53:59 PM »
Quote from: agcat on November 22, 2003, 07:27:18 PM
The four state races mean nothing as far as 2004 is concerned.
Actually, the 36 Gubernatorial elections in 2002 don't say anything as to how the 2004 elections will go either.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 13 queries.