How did Nixon manage to win Kentucky in 1960?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 09:58:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How did Nixon manage to win Kentucky in 1960?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How did Nixon manage to win Kentucky in 1960?  (Read 1828 times)
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 06, 2007, 10:56:48 PM »

Seeing how Kentucky didn't join the Confederacy until 2000, how did Nixon manage to win Kentucky in 1960?

Back then, Kentucky was one of the most Democratic states, and it isn't really that far south, so usually it still supported national Democrats. It was one of Truman's best states. I think Stevenson even won it in 1952 or 1956 (possibly both). It was also one of LBJ's better states. So why did it go GOP in 1960...for NIXON, of all people???

The map of Kentucky for 1960 broken down by county is even weirder. Some usually Republican counties in central Kentucky went very heavily Democratic, while some Democratic counties around Hazard went Republican.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2007, 09:28:30 AM »

There was probably a good deal of anti-Catholicism at work, especially in those traditional Democratic areas you mention.

Kentucky did vote for Stevenson in 1952, but not in 1956.

This was about the time Kentucky started to shift to the right; Stevenson in 1952 was the last Democrat from outside the South to carry Kentucky. But this was still before the Civil Rights Act so you are correct to point out that it is unusual.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,958


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2007, 08:13:28 PM »

There was probably a good deal of anti-Catholicism at work, especially in those traditional Democratic areas you mention.

Those areas have very few Catholics, but they're not really anti-Catholic. Southern West Virginia also has very few Catholics, but Kennedy absolutely stomped Nixon there.

Kennedy lost some heavily Catholic areas in Wisconsin and Iowa that are usually Democratic.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I don't think Kentucky as a whole started shifting to the right until pretty recently. Dukakis didn't lose Kentucky by all that much, if I remember correctly. I think Humphrey came fairly close too.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2007, 10:10:20 PM »

People voted for him.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2007, 02:35:10 PM »


People?

OR ROBOTS???

Perhaps we will never know...
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 14, 2007, 08:56:15 PM »


I literally LOLed on that one.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2007, 03:21:16 AM »

You mean Bandit is admitting a Republican won Kentucky? Uh...I am worried.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 11 queries.