Democrats & leaners: Which of these hypothetical sets of 2024 Senate results would you rather take?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 23, 2025, 03:45:52 AM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, KaiserDave)
  Democrats & leaners: Which of these hypothetical sets of 2024 Senate results would you rather take?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ^
#1
Result 1
 
#2
Result 2
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 23

Author Topic: Democrats & leaners: Which of these hypothetical sets of 2024 Senate results would you rather take?  (Read 404 times)
TML
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,111


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 01, 2024, 12:53:41 AM »

Both of these sets of hypothetical 2024 Senate results would result in the same partisan composition in terms of the numbers of Senators per party (including caucusing Independents), but which one would you prefer more?

Result 1:



Result 2:

Logged
America Needs R'hllor
Parrotguy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,463
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.48


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2024, 08:14:29 AM »

It's very close - result 2 on paper would be preferable because it means Texas has flipped. However, Tester and Brown are party loyalists who would go with Biden's full agenda, while in Florida we might have Stephanie Murphy doing a Sinema 2.0. So all in all, result 1 edges.
Logged
SnowLabrador
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,375
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2024, 08:31:27 AM »

Result 2, just because defeating incumbents is more exciting than defending them. That being said, Result 1 is obviously far more realistic.
Logged
CheapDollarEra?
wnwnwn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,098
Peru


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2024, 08:33:53 AM »

Dems winning Ohio and Texas
Logged
I'm a prince to the grifters, I turn apostles to pimps
20RP12
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,107
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2024, 08:44:56 AM »

Just barely prefer option 1 for the sake of keeping Brown and Tester. The appeal of losing Ted Cruz is mighty, but I couldn't care less about Florida.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,848
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2024, 09:42:11 AM »

Difficult question. While I was inclided to vote #1 at first, I finally went with #2. That means TX has flipped, which good news and probably better to hold in 2030 than OH and MT.
Logged
TML
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,111


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2024, 12:08:35 PM »

It's very close - result 2 on paper would be preferable because it means Texas has flipped. However, Tester and Brown are party loyalists who would go with Biden's full agenda, while in Florida we might have Stephanie Murphy doing a Sinema 2.0. So all in all, result 1 edges.

Please note that the probable Democratic nominee in FL this year appears to be Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, whereas Stephanie Murphy didn't even file paperwork to run this year.
Logged
bagelman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,973
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.60, S: -0.90

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 01, 2024, 11:40:27 PM »

1 for OH.
Logged
America Needs R'hllor
Parrotguy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,463
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.48


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 02, 2024, 08:39:33 AM »

It's very close - result 2 on paper would be preferable because it means Texas has flipped. However, Tester and Brown are party loyalists who would go with Biden's full agenda, while in Florida we might have Stephanie Murphy doing a Sinema 2.0. So all in all, result 1 edges.

Please note that the probable Democratic nominee in FL this year appears to be Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, whereas Stephanie Murphy didn't even file paperwork to run this year.

Oh, that changes everything! I trust Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, so solidly scenario #2.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,559
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 02, 2024, 06:39:03 PM »

Result one because we would have those seats for at least six more years, while Texas may be more winnable in the future, which would be a net.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 11 queries.