Realistic West Wing Presidential Elections 2002 and 2006 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 12:15:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Realistic West Wing Presidential Elections 2002 and 2006 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Realistic West Wing Presidential Elections 2002 and 2006  (Read 35311 times)
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


« on: May 07, 2007, 08:25:45 PM »

FGS I don't even watch the show and I know this much:

2006: TEXAS FOR DEMOCRAT AND CALIFORNIA FOR REPUBLICAN AND THE DEMOCRAT WON

That's because Vinick was from California and Santos was from Texas, both barely went to their favorite sons.  I think Santos only won Texas by 52%-48% or something like that, and Vinick only won California by about 50,000 votes.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2007, 08:28:36 PM »

Here's what I (Rockefeller Republican) think about both 2002 and 2006 West Wing presidential scenarios:

2002:



Bartlet/Hoynes (from 423 EV to 379 EV)
Ritchie/Heston (from 115 EV to 159 EV)

2006:



Vinick/Sullivian (from 266 EV to 297 EV)
Santos/McGarry (from 272 EV to 241 EV)

Any thoughts?

Values voters acctually foudn Santos more appealing than Vinick... South Carolina voted on economic isses, as did Missouri... its not unreasonable to think that South Carolina would go for Santos, the way that the election was set up on the show.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 12 queries.