Are dems punching above weight in Iowa?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:48:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Are dems punching above weight in Iowa?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Are dems punching above weight in Iowa?  (Read 1653 times)
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 13, 2023, 11:10:17 AM »

Wait SC and IL are the same? I mean  it makes sense because most suburban precincts should have enough Asians and other races to get whites below 90 but wow.
90+ White precincts in IL are mostly going to be in conservative Downstate rural towns, so this makes sense.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 18, 2023, 09:52:17 AM »

I remember seeing a map of the 2012 election showing the winner of the white vote in every state. Iowa was blue while California and Illinois were red.

I think without question, WWC voters in Iowa hold on to more of the Democratic tradition than in other places. Parts of Wisconsin and Minnesota would be included in this as well.

Unfortunately for Democrats, these states are so white that it still isn’t enough to win there.
Logged
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,037
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 18, 2023, 09:56:45 AM »

I remember seeing a map of the 2012 election showing the winner of the white vote in every state. Iowa was blue while California and Illinois were red.

I think without question, WWC voters in Iowa hold on to more of the Democratic tradition than in other places. Parts of Wisconsin and Minnesota would be included in this as well.

Unfortunately for Democrats, these states are so white that it still isn’t enough to win there.

Wisconsin and Minnesota are out of reach for Democrats?
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,843
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 18, 2023, 10:06:04 AM »

I remember seeing a map of the 2012 election showing the winner of the white vote in every state. Iowa was blue while California and Illinois were red.

I think without question, WWC voters in Iowa hold on to more of the Democratic tradition than in other places. Parts of Wisconsin and Minnesota would be included in this as well.

Unfortunately for Democrats, these states are so white that it still isn’t enough to win there.

Wisconsin and Minnesota are out of reach for Democrats?

No states are completely out of reach. The trend has made winning there a lot more difficult because the states are so white. Iowa is most challenging, which I believe is the whitest.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,527
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 18, 2023, 03:19:31 PM »

I remember seeing a map of the 2012 election showing the winner of the white vote in every state. Iowa was blue while California and Illinois were red.

I think without question, WWC voters in Iowa hold on to more of the Democratic tradition than in other places. Parts of Wisconsin and Minnesota would be included in this as well.

Unfortunately for Democrats, these states are so white that it still isn’t enough to win there.

Wisconsin and Minnesota are out of reach for Democrats?

No states are completely out of reach. The trend has made winning there a lot more difficult because the states are so white. Iowa is most challenging, which I believe is the whitest.

Yeah, Iowa doesn't have the large metro comparable to the Twin Cities/Milwaukee that is trending left or a booming secondary metro that continues to add thousands of Democratic voters every cycle like Madison.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,828
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: September 21, 2023, 11:15:37 AM »

I remember seeing a map of the 2012 election showing the winner of the white vote in every state. Iowa was blue while California and Illinois were red.

I think without question, WWC voters in Iowa hold on to more of the Democratic tradition than in other places. Parts of Wisconsin and Minnesota would be included in this as well.

Unfortunately for Democrats, these states are so white that it still isn’t enough to win there.

Wisconsin and Minnesota are out of reach for Democrats?

No states are completely out of reach. The trend has made winning there a lot more difficult because the states are so white. Iowa is most challenging, which I believe is the whitest.

Yeah, Iowa doesn't have the large metro comparable to the Twin Cities/Milwaukee that is trending left or a booming secondary metro that continues to add thousands of Democratic voters every cycle like Madison.

fun fact - if Kennedy and Nixon got the exact same percentages in 1960 that Biden and Trump did in 2020 in all 99 counties - Nixon would have gotten 57% of the vote (which is actually what he received). The very republican counties near the Missouri and Nebraska borders are losing voters both as a % but also in raw numbers.

So there will be a path to winning Iowa on a "cities only" basis but it will be viable around the time of the tricentennial.
Logged
Arizona Iced Tea
Minute Maid Juice
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,767


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: September 21, 2023, 11:29:18 AM »

I remember seeing a map of the 2012 election showing the winner of the white vote in every state. Iowa was blue while California and Illinois were red.

I think without question, WWC voters in Iowa hold on to more of the Democratic tradition than in other places. Parts of Wisconsin and Minnesota would be included in this as well.

Unfortunately for Democrats, these states are so white that it still isn’t enough to win there.

Wisconsin and Minnesota are out of reach for Democrats?
Wisconsin isn't nearly as white as Iowa because of the Milwaukee area. Minnesota also has a lot of somalians in the Twin City area.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,828
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: October 11, 2023, 12:31:09 PM »

if you were to try to calculate the actual percent of the white vote nationwide - would you try to get a bigger sample size so that it's 60-65 percent of the electorate. So if you classify every precinct either more than 75% white, or if below that, 60+ percent for Trump as "white", what percent of the electorate would that be?

When I was looking at just 90% white precincts - it's interesting to see a north south divide. In states like Wisconsin - there are far more 90%+ white precincts than 75%+ Trump precincts. In the southern united states, there are far more 75%+ Trump precincts than 90%+ white precincts.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.