FL Judge Says $165k Fines for 3 Minor Code Violations Is Not 'Excessive'
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 11:58:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  FL Judge Says $165k Fines for 3 Minor Code Violations Is Not 'Excessive'
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FL Judge Says $165k Fines for 3 Minor Code Violations Is Not 'Excessive'  (Read 194 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,339
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 10, 2024, 04:28:08 PM »

Institute for Justice
Quote
Yesterday, a Florida court ruled that sky-high fines for minor infractions issued to Lantana resident Sandy Martinez did not violate the state constitution’s prohibition on excessive fines. The Institute for Justice (IJ), a nonprofit law firm that protects property rights nationwide, will appeal that decision.

“Six-figure fines for parking on your own property are outrageous. The Florida Constitution’s Excessive Fines Clause was designed to stop precisely this sort of abuse—to prevent people from being fined into poverty for trivial violations,” said IJ Attorney Mike Greenberg. “The court’s opinion renders those bedrock protections a dead letter. We will appeal.”

The $165,000 that Sandy owes is a result of daily fines the city assessed for harmless property code violations. Most of this amount—more than $100,000—is a result of the way Sandy’s family parked their cars on their own property. Sandy, her two driving-age children, and her sister all own cars so they can get to their jobs or school. When all four cars were parked in the driveway, sometimes one of them would have two tires on the lawn. For that, the city fined Sandy $250 per day. And under the city’s policy, fines continue to accrue until the homeowner corrects the problem and calls the city to inspect the property to confirm it is in compliance.

After receiving the parking violation, Sandy called the city like she was supposed to, but an inspector never came out. Once Sandy discovered the fines were still accruing over a year later, she immediately contacted the city again and passed the inspection. But by then, the amount she owed was $101,750.

The city admitted the way Sandy’s family parked in their own driveway caused no harm. And, absurdly, it would be legal for Sandy to park on grass next to the roadway—adjacent to an intersection where there are regularly traffic accidents.
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,720
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2024, 04:46:54 PM »

Lantana, PBC, Florida moment
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,035
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2024, 06:33:49 PM »

Why is it the city's business at all if someone has tires on their own lawn? These sort of nanny state municipal regulations are insane.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.204 seconds with 11 queries.