2022 Wisconsin Senate Race if Russ Feingold were the nominee (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:17:43 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2022 Wisconsin Senate Race if Russ Feingold were the nominee (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What would the margin have been for the 2022 WI Senate Race if Russ Feingold were the Democratic nominee?
#1
>R+6%
 
#2
R+6% to R+4%
 
#3
R+4% to R+2%
 
#4
<R+2%
 
#5
<D+2%
 
#6
D+2% to D+4%
 
#7
D+4% to D+6%
 
#8
>D+6%
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: 2022 Wisconsin Senate Race if Russ Feingold were the nominee  (Read 1254 times)
WalterWhite
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,990
United States
Political Matrix
E: -9.35, S: -9.83

P
« on: May 18, 2023, 09:36:07 PM »

What the title asks
Logged
WalterWhite
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,990
United States
Political Matrix
E: -9.35, S: -9.83

P
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2023, 05:39:52 AM »


No, assume Ron Johnson is the incumbent.
Logged
WalterWhite
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,990
United States
Political Matrix
E: -9.35, S: -9.83

P
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2023, 02:22:58 PM »

Quote from: GM Team Member WB
I think he would've done similarly to Barnes.

Quote from: Xing
If he had won in 2016 and everything had turned out the same, he probably would’ve won by around the margin Evers did (Johnson probably wouldn’t have been his opponent.) If he had run despite losing in 2016, I think the race would’ve ended up similarly to how it actually did.

Quote from: My Aim Is True
Might've done slightly better than Barnes but I think Johnson would've still pulled it out. Could've been almost exactly 50-50 with Feingold.

Quote from: JMT
If Feingold was the incumbent, he probably would’ve won re-election. If he was Ron Johnson’s challenger, he probably would’ve narrowly lost (similar margin to Barnes).

As a side note: Russ Feingold probably would be in the Senate today had he run in 2012 for the open seat. I imagine Tammy Baldwin wouldn’t have run in that case, and I think Feingold would’ve defeated Tommy Thompson. Given that Feingold wanted to return to the Senate after his 2010 defeat, it’s somewhat odd he waited to run till 2016 instead of running in 2012.

Quote from: JMT
If Feingold was the incumbent, he probably would’ve won re-election. If he was Ron Johnson’s challenger, he probably would’ve narrowly lost (similar margin to Barnes).

As a side note: Russ Feingold probably would be in the Senate today had he run in 2012 for the open seat. I imagine Tammy Baldwin wouldn’t have run in that case, and I think Feingold would’ve defeated Tommy Thompson. Given that Feingold wanted to return to the Senate after his 2010 defeat, it’s somewhat odd he waited to run till 2016 instead of running in 2012.

Quote from: Galeel
Feingold probably would have won simply because national Democrats wouldn't have abandoned the race. Barnes nearly won even with that.

Quote from: Vosem
It would not have been a GOP pickup if there were a Democratic incumbent; the Republican nominee would've been someone significantly weaker than Ron Johnson, unfortunately.

If Johnson was the incumbent, and Feingold ran instead of Barnes in our world? I don't think it would've been any different.

Feingold would have probably been a MUCH weaker candidate than Barnes because he was a two-time loser.
Logged
WalterWhite
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,990
United States
Political Matrix
E: -9.35, S: -9.83

P
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2023, 07:31:31 AM »

Sorry if I was unclear, but VOTE ON THE BASIS THAT FEINGOLD LOST BOTH 2010 AND 2016!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 14 queries.